Surface World January 2019 Surface World January 2019 | Page 26
IMF: THE INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS FINISHING
The IMF lobbys the Parliamentary
and Scientific Committee
On a cold,
wet and
miserable
day in late
November
both the
President-elect, Professor
Karl Ryder, and the
Chairman of the Science
Committee, Trevor Crichton,
attended the annual
luncheon in the House of
Lords of the Parliamentary
and Scientific Committee,
of which the IMF is an
Associate Member.
About 100 people attended, including
academics, industrialists, politicians,
members of scientific organisations and
individual members. By attending PSC
meetings and functions, we are able to
raise the IMF’s profile and promote the
surface engineering industry in general,
as well as help shepherd Government
in its policies regarding industrial and
investment strategies.
24
the importance of the surface
engineering industry to the UK’s economy!
This importance was stressed during
our conversations.
The guest speaker was Sir Mark Walport,
Chief Executive of UKRI (UK Research and
Innovation). UKRI funds about 70% of all
R&D carried out in the UK and was launched
on 1st April 2018. It comprises 7 old
research councils, InnovateUK (ex-Technology
Strategy Board) and a new body, Research
England and it is mainly funded by the
Department for Business, Energy and
Industrial strategy (BEIS), although some
strategic funding is obtained from other
sources, such as overseas aid.
In his address, Walport said that it is now
Government policy to increase the level of
R&D investment from its current 1.7% of
GDP to 2.4% by 2027 and to increase this
to 3% at some unspecified time in the future.
Whilst this is an applaudable objective,
it is noteworthy that whilst the UK would be
ahead of the global average (2.3% of GDP),
it would still be below the levels enjoyed by
some other countries, such as the USA
(2.79%), Germany (2.88%), Denmark
(3.01%), Japan (3.28%), Republic of Korea
(4.23%) and Israel (4.27%).
Government is concerned about education
and we took the opportunity to explain to
other guests and politicians, that the IMF
runs the only dedicated surface coatings
course in the UK, using both tutored and
distance learning teaching methods. Research funding by UK Government was
a consequence of the First World War, after
which, in 1918, the Haldane Report made
recommendations that government should
be evidence driven and that it should listen to
businesses, industry and academics. Perhaps
some may comment that it has taken over
100 years and we are still not following these
principles! However, since UKRI started, it is
endeavouring to follow the principles set out
by Haldane.
Although the UK’s economy is primarily
based on the service sector, with 80% of
GDP, surface engineering facilitates the
manufacture of 50% of the UK’s GDP that
is derived from manufacturing – and this
represents the remaining 20% of our GDP.
On top of this, without the ability to modify
surfaces, much of the service sector could
not operate in its present format, as it is
reliant, in part, on electronics and medical
equipment and parts, all of which are,
in turn, reliant on surface engineering
technologies…. Nevertheless, it remains
quite worrying how few people appreciate Furthermore, with Brexit on the horizon,
Walport said that the UK will need an
industrial strategy that is based on research
and innovation and this should include
research and innovation activities in both
the manufacturing and service industries,
so the whole of the UK’s economy is served.
Part of this strategy has been the creation
of the Industry Strategy Challenge Fund
and the first recipient of this funding has
been the Faraday battery challenge, which
has identified the need for developments
in electrochemistry. This sector, of course,
sits extremely well in the lap of surface
JANUARY 2019
engineering and the IMF is encouraging and
it is one aspect of the UK’s future economy
that we need to be a major part of, so we are
trying to work with our memberships to help
develop relevant novel systems.
UKRI has also identified other future
challenges, such as manufacturing and
future materials, healthcare and early
diagnoses, energy, space, construction
and quantum technologies, all of which
the surface engineering industry will need to
play a significant role. Despite UKRI having
a broad interest base, it is still seeking new
opportunities to help develop the UK’s
economy and is keen to receive suggestions
from any interested parties.
The UKRI is also planning to set up industrial
clusters of partners who have similar ideas
and potential developments, but are in need
of investment to develop their expertise in
developing and commercialising new
technologies that will benefit the UK’s
economy. However, Walport stressed that
these clusters should be of similar minded
companies in the same locality, as some
previous attempts at setting up clusters had
failed due their partners being geographically
remote from each other.
Since the West Midlands is the cradle of
surface engineering and it is still home
to many companies associated with such
technologies, maybe a surface engineering
cluster could be set up here?
As part of the PSC’s recognition of
the IMF, we have been invited to submit
possible topics for discussion by them.
We are currently considering the
following suggestions:
a) The dependency of the UK’s economy
on surface engineering;
b) The importance of SMEs in the UK, and:
c) The future sustainability of materials
and remanufacturing.
If anyone has any suggestions of broad
topics, please let me know.
Telephone: 0121 622 7387
Email: [email protected]
Visit: www.materialsfinishing.org
read online: www.surfaceworld.com