Regulatory Digital Product Passports as a Catalyst for U. S. Supply Chain Visibility
enabling exchange across heterogeneous systems and reducing switching costs. More broadly, adoption trajectories are shaped by switching costs and network effects; organizations that reduce friction to participate in emerging data networks are better positioned as standards diffuse.
Similar interoperability-first approaches have historically succeeded in domains such as financial messaging( SWIFT), healthcare data exchange( HL7 / FHIR), industrial interoperability ecosystems associated with OMG standards, and logistics EDI networks, where heterogeneous systems could participate without requiring replacement of existing operational platforms.
Recommendation 3: Confidentiality and selective disclosure controls must be treated as firstorder requirements within a deliberate governance architecture. Both ESPR and UNTP emphasize balancing transparency with protection of sensitive information and maintaining control with the information owner. Implementation programs should therefore define role-appropriate access policies, governance workflows for evidence sharing, documentation practices that satisfy compliance while minimizing unnecessary exposure, and dataspace-compatible policy enforcement mechanisms that preserve organizational control over sensitive data while still enabling interoperable exchange. This is not merely a security concern— it is a decision architecture question: who sees what, when, and with what verification, determines how supply chain intelligence can flow across organizational boundaries without compromising competitive position.
Recommendation 4: Adoption efforts should be anchored in pilots that demonstrate " carrot " value rather than only compliance completion. MITRE identifies operational efficiency, improved risk management, and enhanced ethical sourcing controls as incentives likely to sustain participation. The CBP trade-facilitation example provides a model in which structured documentation can translate into faster clearance— an outcome that can motivate adoption through measurable performance gains while also supporting due diligence obligations such as UFLPA. Demonstrated operational value can help overcome diffusion and critical-mass challenges that cause many standardization efforts to stall.
Recommendation 5: Organizations should align DPP instance-data serialization with an open BOM carrier standard from the outset. SPDX 3.1( Supply Chain and Hardware Profiles) and CycloneDX 1.7( HBOM, OBOM) are the leading candidates, with SPDX 3.0 already formally adopted by OMG( now part of EDM Association) in March 2025 and advancing toward ISO publication [ 6 ], [ 7 ]. Selecting a BOM format early addresses two of MITRE ' s four conditions for strategic visibility— normalized standards and normalized instance data at scale— while also positioning organizations for interoperability with SBOM-oriented regulatory requirements such as those under the EU Cyber Resilience Act and U. S. Executive Order 14028. Because SPDX 3.1 is an ontology-based knowledge graph rather than a flat list, its Supply Chain and Hardware Profiles can represent the same provenance sub-graphs that MITRE argues must be stitchable into strategic meta-graphs, making it a natural technical complement to the DPP policy frameworks ESPR and UNTP establish.
EDM Association – Journal of Innovation 37