Study: Clear stance, clear direction | Page 3

| 03 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Authentic leadership = good leadership = corporate success? Unfortunately, it is not quite as simple as that. But recent research findings are unambiguous: authentic leadership, and a leadership style that encourages authentic behaviour in employees, can help organisations become more effective. Equally, leadership without an authentic stance can cause lasting damage in the corporate environment. An authentic stance does not mean laying bare one’s inner life and indulging, without restraint, all one’s moods, emotions and difficult personality traits – as some publications on authenticity would have us believe. Rather, it is about adopting a FUNDAMENTAL STANCE (cf. van den Bosch & Taris, 2014): that promotes harmony between managers’ actions, inner values, and personal convictions (‘authentic action’); that helps managers resist to bow to external pressure (‘avoidance of self-alienation’); There is much evidence for the positive influence of authentic behaviour. The present study – carried out by goetzpartners, Förster und Netzwerk, and Prof. Matthias Spitzmüller (Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada) – shows which factors promote authentic behaviour in companies as well as what obstacles to authentic behaviour exist and how they can be overcome. Recent research findings underscore that authentic managers come across as more charismatic and are more successful at steering employees through change. This is especially true of those employees who are generally more critical of management: the effect of authenticity on employees’ attitudes towards their line managers is strongest in such cases. According to other studies, authentic leadership has a positive effect on the acceptance of mistakes and, consequently, on the performance of teams of employees. Most importantly, authenticity can serve as a moral compass that prevents employees from breaking rules or behaving unethically (Spitzmüller & Ilies, 2010 and Cianci, Hannah, Roberts & Tsakumis, 2014). >> that enables managers to actively steer their own actions rather than having those actions dictated by others (‘avoidance of external influence’); that therefore projects credibility and reliability.