Study: Clear stance, clear direction | Page 13

| 13 However, a legitimate question remains: what sort of authenticity are we really talking about? Isn’t it the case that managers are always playing a role, and are they ever really able to invest this role with their “whole self”? More importantly, should we even desire that they behave authentically? At this point, critics of authenticity generally conjure up the image of the bad-tempered, misanthropic or demotivated manager who indulges his/her personality to the full at work. Naturally, this should not, and cannot, be what we understand by authenticity. It is true that every one of us, whether we are managers or not, plays many different roles in life: as a father, sister, girlfriend, trainer, club member or employee. It is normal, indeed necessary, to adjust one’s behaviour to each of these individual roles. Thus, behaving authentically does not mean living out all one’s personal traits to the full without regard for the specific role or indulging one’s every fleeting whim. Rather, it has to do with a fundamental attitude, where inner values and external behaviour are in harmony. Our definition of authenticity is based on a recent scientific study on the nature of authenticity (Bosch & Taris, 2014): ACCORDING TO THIS RESEARCH, AUTHENTICITY IS THUS A BASIC ATTITUDE ... that promotes harmony between managers’ actions, inner values, and personal convictions AUTHENTIC ACTION that helps managers resist to bow to external pressure AVOIDANCE OF SELF-ALIENATION that enables managers to actively steer their own actions rather than having those actions dictated by others AVOIDANCE OF EXTERNAL INFLUENCE that therefore projects: CREDIBILITY AND RELIABILITY We note that this kind of authenticity should not be misunderstood as friendliness. On the contrary, an authentic manager can lead with a more distanced or authoritarian style – as long as the manager is reliable and does not surprise the employees with unexpected behaviour. Transparency and expectations that are clearly expressed are possible in a distanced manager-employee relationship as well as in a very close one – provided the manager acts with integrity. It is important that these features are present because they strengthen the employees’ trust and grant them the confidence to act. ||