Student Law Review Issue 1 | Page 106

detention of the offenders in community residences instead of prisons,203 the separation of juvenile offenders from adult prisoners204 and the review of sentences upon attaining the age of eighteen,205 Part 5 of the Children Bill also explicitly prohibits the imposition of the death sentence on persons under eighteen206 and sets out the procedure for the establishment and operation of a juvenile court.207 These measures if adopted by Trinidad and Tobago will ensure greater compliance with Articles 37 and 40 of the CRC, and they will ensure a higher standard of protection of the rights of juvenile offenders. The Children Bill 2012, however remains lex ferenda and until proclaimed does nothing to protect the rights of juvenile offenders. CONCLUSION The degree of human rights protection offered to juvenile offenders by the criminal justice system of Trinidad and Tobago is inadequate. It falls short of the standard required by the Convention on the Rights of the Child,208 and juvenile offenders do not have all of their rights respected. The age of criminal responsibility falls below the international standard, and legislation must be enacted in order for it to be raised to an age that is in conformity with internationally recognized standards. Detention centers for before, during and after trial must be updated, to ensure that juvenile offenders are treated in a manner which is cognizant of their age and vulnerability and ensures that they are free from the corrupting influence of adult prisoners. There is also the need for the enactment of legislation which creates a wider variety of sentencing options and which ensures that life imprisonment and capital punishment may never be imposed on juvenile offenders.                                                               203 Supra fn 90 at s60 Supra fn 90 at s53 205 Supra fn 90 at s59 206 Supra fn 90 at s75 207 Supra fn 90 at s81 208 Supra fn 1 204 103