StomatologyEduJ 5(1) SEJ_4-2017r | Page 58

CV
Questions
COMPLETE PROSTHESES TREATMENT – PRESENT AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Review Articles

79. Preti G, Salerno M, Notaro V et al. SET: simplified treatment of edentulous patients. Minerva Stomatol. 2011; 60( 11-12): 579-585. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 5) Scopus( 7)
80. Ceruti P, Bellia E, Aramini R, Gassino G. A novel method for defining and transferring to the laboratory aesthetic data of the edentulous patient: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26( 5): 487-489. doi: 10.11607 / ijp. 3320. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 3)
81. Critchlow SB, Ellis JS. Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010; 38( 1): 2-9. doi: 10.1016 / j. jdent. 2009.08.004. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 90) Scopus( 40)
82. Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Teaching an abbreviated impression technique for complete dentures in an undergraduate dental curriculum. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85( 2): 121-125. doi: 10.1067 / mpr. 2001.113699. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( X) Scopus( X)
83. Wallace LN. One-step in-office immediate dentures. Dent Today. 2013; 32( 8): 72-75. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 33) Scopus( 17)
84. Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, Okada M, Nokubi T. A CAD / CAM system for removable denture. Part I: fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7( 1): 17-21. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 108) Scopus( 50)
85. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures:
Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109( 6): 361-366. doi: 10.1016 / S0022- 3913( 13) 60318-2. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 107) Scopus( 50)
86. Fernandez MA, Nimmo A, Behar-Horenstein LS. Digital denture fabrication in pre- and postdoctoral education: a survey of U. S. Dental Schools. J Prosthodont. 2016; 25( 1): 83-90. doi: 10.1111 / jopr. 12287. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 8)
87. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114( 6): 818-825. doi: 10.1016 / j. prosdent. 2015.08.001. [ Full text links ][ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 39) Scopus( 19)
88. Smith NJ. The education and training of personnel auxiliary to dentistry. A submission to the Nuffield Foundation. Br Dent J. 1993; 175( 6): 193-195. doi: 10.1038 / sj. bdj. 4808269 [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 4) Scopus( 3)
89. The National Denturist Association, USA [ internet ] 2017 [ updated 2013; cited 2017 October 28 ]. Available from http:// nationaldenturist. com / affiliates.
90. Kravits AS, Treasure ET. Utilisation of dental auxiliaries – attitudinal review from six developed countries. Int Dent J. 2007; 57( 4): 267-273. doi: 10.1111 / j. 1875- 595X. 2007. tb00131. x. [ Full text links ] [ PubMed ] Google Scholar( 13) Scopus( 12)
Sorin URAM-ŢUCULESCU
DDS, MS, PhD, Associate Professor
Department of Prosthodontics VCU School of Dentistry
Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA 23298-0566, USA

CV

Dr. Sorin Uram-Tuculescu is an Associate Professor at the VCU School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, in Richmond, VA, U. S. A. He is involved in pre-clinical / clinical teaching, service and research. Uram maintains a part-time private practice focused on prosthodontics. He authored / co-authored 7 textbooks, and participated in the elaboration of 50 + published papers and presentations. Dr. Uram-Tuculescu lectures nationally on prosthodontic topics, patient management, ethics in dental profession.

Questions

Current trends in demographics and edentulism indicate that:
qa.
Prevalence of edentulism is increasing overall;
qb.
Prevalence of edentulism is decreasing overall;
qc.
The utilization rate of dentures is increasing overall;
qd.
The utilization rate of dentures is decreasing overall.
The standard of care for the edentulous mandible is:
qa.
Conventional complete denture;
qb.
Implant overdenture;
qc.
Implant supported fixed prosthesis;
qd.
Not pertaining to a specific treatment option.
Simplified complete denture treatment techniques:
qa.
Provide comparable outcomes, as compared to traditional techniques;
qb.
Are generally more expensive;
qc.
Require digital protocols;
qd.
Should be reserved to specialists in prosthodontics.
Fabrication of complete denture using digital protocols:
qa.
Is time consuming;
qb.
Requires an optic impression;
qc.
Follows simplified clinical protocols;
qd.
Is mainstream in the developed world.

288

Stoma Edu J. 2017; 4( 4): 282-288 http:// www. stomaeduj. com