STANSW Science Education News Journal 2019 2019 SEN Vol 68 Issue 3 | Page 38

ARTICLES Understanding and Calculating the Heat Capacity of Solutions (continued) 100 g × 4.18 J.K –1 .g –1 = 418 J/K K + (aq): 0.100 mol × 22 J.K –1 .mol –1 = 2.2 J/K NO 3– (aq): 0.100 mol × –87 J.K –1 .mol– 1 = –8.7 J/K 4.22 4.21 Water: TOTAL = 418 + 2.2 − 8.7 = 411.5 J/K, \actual temperature fall = 3600 J /(411.5 J/K) = 8.75 K Dissolution of ammonium nitrate We use about 100.0 g of water and make a solution that is close to 1.00 molal by adding 8.00 gram of ammonium nitrate. 4.17 NH 4 NO 3 (s) → NH 4+ (aq) + NO 3– (aq) Δ H = +26 kJ −366 −133 0 20 40 60 Temperature (°C) 80 100 Figure 1: The heat capacity of liquid water −207 Hence again, by the usual method the heat absorbed dissolving is computed to be 0.100 mol = 2.6 kJ The heat capacity of liquid water is not simple. The 11 data points were fitted using Excel’s built-in polynomial routines. Actually, a quintic polynomial was required to get a visually acceptable fit. Treating the heat capacity of the solution as the heat capacity of the water, Cp = –4.711538 × 10 –11 T 5 + 1.517920 × 10 –8 T 4 –1.861029 × 10 –6 T 3 + 1.161767 × 10 –4 T 2 –3.491806×10 –3 T + 4.217489 R² = 0.9997547 Heat capacity = m.Cp = 418 J/K Temperature fall = 2600 J /(418 J/K) = 6.22 K By once again including the amounts of dissolved ions: Water: 100 g × 4.18 J.K –1 .g –1 = 418 J/K NH 4+ (aq): 0.100 mol × 80 J.K –1 .g –1 = 8.0 J/K NO 3– (aq): 4.19 4.18 The amount of NH 4 NO 3 dissolving is 0.100 mol. The amount of heat released is calculated using standard heats of formation and the equation. 4.20 Conclusion Usually the heat capacity of the solution is treated as being the heat capacity of the water. Whilst this is a good first approximation since the great majority of the molecules present are water, nevertheless, multiplying the mass of the solution by 4.18 J.K –1 .g –1 is not appropriate. In the examples above, the heat capacity was less than the heat capacity of the water alone. This is very common. The correction of adding the heat capacities of the ions is computationally simple and should give more valid and accurate results. 0.100 mol × –87 J.K –1 .mol –1 = –8.7 J/K TOTAL = 418 + 8.0 – 8.7 = 417.3 J/K, ∴actual temperature fall = 2600 J /(417.3 J/K) = 6.23 K The temperature drops much less than with KNO 3 . The models above are linear. In Figure 1, the data for water are taken from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. In the temperature range that is commonly used for school thermochemistry experiments, using the constant value 4.18 J.K –1 .mol –1 is an excellent approximation, so a linear model works well. However, over the wider but limited temperature range from 0 to 100˚C for liquid water at atmospheric pressure, a polynomial fit is far better, so integration can be used to calculate enthalpy differences. However, over the much broader temperature range for gases, the asymptotic behaviour of the model needs to be correct. The NIST chemical database is searchable online, and provides excellent data for many substances. Reference L G Hepler and J K Hovey, Can. J. Chem. 1996 74:639- 649. Available at https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/ pdfplus/10.1139/v96-069 Note of thanks I thank all my chemistry colleagues at NBHS for raising this matter as a professional discussion, provoking me to think this through, calculate, and share the results more broadly. 38 SCIENCE EDUCATIONAL NEWS VOL 68 NO 3