Spotlight Feature Articles ORE SORTING | Page 3

ORE SORTING gone from being mainly used in diamond and industrial metal operations to potentially finding new homes in uranium, iron ore, coal, copper, gold, silver and phosphate mines, to name a few. XRT The ore sorting solution gaining most traction of late is XRT. Most of the XRT solutions on the market recognise and separate materials based on their specific atomic density, allowing a high level of sorting purity irrespective of size, moisture or surface pollution, according to the companies manufacturing the machines. In addition to a number of diamond case study examples (see The ore sorting effect below), tungsten and tin operations have also seen XRT machines work wonders. For instance, Minsur’s San Rafael tin operation in Peru repaid the $24 million capital cost that came with buying a TOMRA 3,000 t/d XRT ore sorter within four months of installation. The use of sensor-based XRT ore sorting converted uneconomic waste material into economic ore, according to TOMRA’s Robben, meaning material below the cutoff grade for the main plant, set at 0.9% Sn in 2014, was able to be treated with lower specific operating costs, thus bolstering reserves. And, capacity of the San Rafael main plant freed up after the installation of the ore sorter, with nameplate rising to 3,600 t/d, compared with 2,950 t/d, Robben said. Companies are also starting to realise the solutions can be applied at the front end of operations, too. For instance, at a bulk sample trial in Western Australia for Novo Resources’ Karratha gold project, a combination of XRT and electromagnetic induction (EM) sensors were recently used to concentrate gold. The nuggety mineralisation witnessed at Karratha had, up until this point, proven tricky to separate from the waste materials, but recent studies showed a combination of XRT and EM sensor-based ore sorting could do exactly this. Novo said the XRT identifies rocks containing particles of high atomic mass such as gold, while EM identifies rocks that become electrically charged due to the presence of metallic particles. At Vista Gold’s Mt Todd gold project in Australia the combination of XRT and laser-based ore sorting has shown a coarse fraction (+16 mm) high pressure grinding rolled product can efficiently be separated into waste and ore piles. The laser sensor, in this case, detects quartz in the ore after it has already gone through an XRT- based process. Robben was quick to dispel the opinion that existing mines are reticent about using XRT ore sorting in fear of underfeeding their follow-on processing plants. “As the application of sensor-based ore sorting often leads to a reduction of total cash costs, it turns resources into reserves and actually increases the life of the mine. Marginal resources are turned into reserves, for example, at Wolfram’s Mittersill mine in Austria, Coeur Alaska’s Kensington gold mine in the US or Minsur’s San Rafael tin mine in Peru.” Kroukamp, who with Cronimet has overseen the installation and running of several XRT ore sorting solutions, explains why there may be a need to apply more than one sensor-based solution at mining projects in the future. “Once you start going into finely disseminated tungsten ores, especially scheelite, you get these little spots throughout the rock…When you start Density separation his month, W Resources is expecting the mechanical completion of an allmineral jig plant at its La Parrilla tungsten-tin mine in Portugal. With a throughput of 350 t/h, the two alljig ® jigs will provide grading, enrichment and cleaning of the pre-ground ore. The alljig process involves the feed material initially being fluidised with pulsed water, with the grains graded according to density. The jigs separate the specifically lighter scheelite-poor yield from the specifically heavier scheelite-rich ore from the stratified material bed, allmineral said. The processing plant, with a capacity of 155 t/h connected to the pre-concentration stage through the alljig jigs, will ensure tailings are separated from the valuable material, thereby achieving a 65% WO 3 recovery, the company said. The fines produced in several processing stages are to be recovered in a separate circuit. allmineral also delivered a concentrator for the plant at La Parrilla, which provides the final stage of beneficiation in the process to produce a 66% WO 3 concentrate and 62% Sn final concentrate. Following the first shipment of tungsten concentrate from the operation, announced in December, W completed three further shipments as of February 5. Cumulative production at the operation has exceeded 50 t of tungsten concentrate, with output rates expected to grow in later months as production switches to higher-grade mined ore from historic tailings feed. T going too small, the [XRT] machine fails as a result of detection. The signal coming back is negligible because of, let’s call it, background noise,” he said. Robben said TOMRA is continuously developing the hardware and software to improve detection efficiency, and that it is tailoring its image processing to detect “specific mineralogical features”. This detection issue may not be addressed by using more sensors, according to Guthrie. “Multiple sensors can provide alternative ways to categorise the ore or waste, and potentially allow for more effective sorting, however the heterogeneity of the ore is what will be the deciding factor. It should also be noted that for low concentration elements or minerals, the sorters rely on associations with higher concentration minerals rather than attempting to detect the valuable component. This will rely on identifiable and consistent associations, which may not be possible with highly complex orebodies.” The value proposition Even if a mining company has a heterogeneous and distinguishable orebody suitable for ore sorting detection, it doesn’t necessarily mean ore sorting should be applied to it, according to Guthrie. There are, broadly, three cases for improving project value through ore sorting, he said. These include: n Converting sub-grade waste (including previously rejected material) to ore that can be economic at modest recovery of values; n Sorting of ore to increase grade and reduce subsequent processing and transport costs, and; n Sorting of ore to bring forward cash flow. Guthrie said: “The first case adds value to the project by conversion of waste to ore. On this basis, recovery is not critical and the value of the recovered material needs to cover processing costs plus margin. This can add significant value to a project where the processing capacity exceeds the ore supply rate and mine waste can be converted to ‘ore’ by simple low cost processing.” Such applications are common in the mining space and where Cronimet normally starts its conversation with mining customers, according to Kroukamp. Guthrie said the second case – sorting of ore to increase grade and reduce subsequent processing and transport costs – is generally only economically favourable if the processing and ore transport costs are high (in relation to head grade) and the recovery of values is also high (eg >95%) . “This is particularly applicable to massive orebodies where there is little disseminated MARCH 2019 | International Mining