hazard classifications under the Classification, Labelling & Packaging( CLP) Regulation.
Decisions currently being taken in Brussels could have consequences that extend far beyond classification labels, regulatory status of a substance and administrative procedures. At stake is whether Europe can continue to rely on ethanol as an effective, widely available and practical solution for disinfection and hygiene, but also for many other sectors.
In February 2026, ECHA’ s Biocidal Products Committee( BPC) supported the approval of ethanol as an active substance for hand and surface disinfection under the BPR. 1 The discussions within ECHA have focused in particular on the potential classification of ethanol as a carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction( CMR) substance based on date from overconsumption of alcoholic beverages, despite its long-standing and widespread use in disinfectants and hygiene applications.
The EC has just prepared an Implementing Act based on that opinion. At the same time, the Greek competent authorities( CAs) have indicated their intention to submit a dossier under the Classification, Labelling & Packaging( CLP) Regulation proposing a reproductive toxicity classification for ethanol. The outcome matters not only for the biocides sector, but also for a much wider ecosystem of industries, workers and consumers that depend on ethanol every day.
Why ethanol matters
Ethanol occupies a unique position among disinfectant active substances. It provides broadspectrum antimicrobial efficacy, acts rapidly, leaves no residue and can be used safely and effectively in products intended for frequent use.
These characteristics make it particularly valuable in hand disinfectants, surface disinfectants, wipes, sprays and healthcare applications. Ethanol-based products have become an integral component of routine hygiene practices of standard infection prevention because they combine effectiveness with practicality.
Its importance extends beyond exceptional circumstances, such as public health emergencies like COVID-19. Consumers employ ethanol-containing products on kitchen surfaces, household equipment and shared spaces. Food producers use it to support sanitary conditions throughout production processes. Businesses, schools, transport operators and hospitality providers all depend on products containing ethanol.
Ethanol has applications beyond biocidal products. It is also widely used across detergents, cleaning products, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and industrial applications. As a result, regulatory decisions affecting ethanol have the potential to create ripple effects throughout entire supply chains.
An Analysis of Alternatives submitted in 2025 concluded that no available alternative could match ethanol ' s combined performance in terms of efficacy, safety, availability and practicality across
the uses assessed. As a result, any requirement to replace it would have implications extending beyond formulation, potentially affecting product performance, supply chains and costs.
The real risk: Losing ethanol in Europe
Much of the current regulatory debate focuses on technical questions surrounding classification. Yet for downstream users, the central issue is far more straightforward: will ethanol remain available in Europe?
A CMR classification would not merely add new wording to a label. Because EU chemicals legislation is highly interconnected, such a classification would trigger consequences across multiple regulatory frameworks, including the BPR, REACH and other sectoral legislation that rely on CLP classifications as regulatory triggers.
For ethanol, a CMR classification would immediately trigger some of the most restrictive provisions of EU chemicals legislation. Under the BPR, it would become subject to the exclusion criteria applicable to CMR substances, which means a ban for general public and serious restrictions at professional level.
28 SPECIALITY CHEMICALS MAGAZINE ESTABLISHED 1981