5
5. Why do you like to teach children between the ages of 15 and 18? Answer: Well, I think I've got used to it, I've been working in high school for 11 years and I like it because the debate that can occur is greater. However I would love to work in smaller courses.
6. Do you think it would be important to consider philosophy? Answer:Of course, since the amount of tools it delivers is really a contribution to the conscience, autonomy and moral development of people.
7. Why do you think there are people who consider this branch of science unimportant? Answer:I imagine that because they consider "normal" that the priorities are Language and Mathematics; However, what philosophy does is make sense of all the subjects; since the error is to separate the knowledge.
8. Why cost that philosophy and psychology were considered one more branch in science? Answer:Strictly speaking, philosophy is not an empirical science; its development is macada by the deepest metaphysics and perhaps for that reason the criterion to consider it as important science within the school curriculum is different. However, that is ignorance because it is to ignore that philosophy gives rise to all knowledge concerning our Western culture.
9. Did you have the subject when you were in school?
Answer:so I remember if I had the subject.
10. Have you seen any progress in the population thanks to philosophy?
Answer:In European countries and in Chilean schools where philosophy is taught at all levels, yes. Greater autonomy, greater awareness, greater cognitive abilities, greater taste for reading and the arts, etc.