Soltalk March 2019 | Page 29

month by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and published by the Department for Education, outline how free speech must be protected. These state that those who try to ban controversial figures are in breach of legislation, adding that the rules must be observed by all universities and unions. They explain that, while students are free to protest peacefully against speakers, unions cannot censor their guests simply because they might “offend, shock or disturb others.” An EHRC spokesman said freedom of speech should only be curtailed if “there are safety concerns or it constitutes unlawful behaviour.” If free speech rules are broken, the Office for Students regulator can step in and legal action can be taken in the civil courts. The move follows a string of incidents in which students have tried to prevent speakers from expressing views with which they disagreed. Only last month, columnist Peter Hitchens complained he was being “censored” after the students’ union at Plymouth University cancelled his engagement to speak because, they claimed, it clashed with LGBT events on campus. In a statement, the union stated “The published views of Peter Hitchens are not necessarily aligned with the Students' Union’s vibrant celebration of the LGBT+ community this month.” Mr Hitchens, known for his conservative standpoint on some social issues, said excuses were being “dredged up” to prevent him from speaking. Meanwhile ... Trainee snowflakes got a boost last month when a petition about their study hours came to the attention of MPs. An on-line petition signed by around 180,000 people demanded a 10.00am start to school lessons, “because teenagers are so tired due to having to wake up very early to get to school.” It continues, “The government should require secondary schools to start later, which will lead to increased productivity at school.” In a debate on February 11 triggered by the petition, MPs voiced support for the argument that schools should start later in the day for the sake of night-owl teenagers. Some speakers however warned that any change could make life more complex for working parents, meaning that some pupils may have to walk home in the dark. The poor darlings ... And a former RSPB (Royal Society for 27 the Protection of Birds) officer got himself into hot water in January by describing hedge sparrows as “trollops.” Chris Edwards was speaking at a community wildlife group event in Birmingham when he likened the species, also known as dunnocks, to prostitutes. His words upset Lorna Preston so much that she stormed out of the room in protest, claiming he had made her physically sick. She described his description of the mating habits of the bird as a “slur on women,” adding, “I’m not sure who in the room had an awareness of the power at play.” However, Ms Preston should have not have been surprised. After all, the publicity for the talk warned that Mr Edwards would allude to the intimate habits of some breeds. “Trollops! Gigolos!” shouted the poster. “Chris Edwards, formerly of RSPB, names and shames them and gives an insight into birds and their behaviour.” The RSPB (who were unaware of the talk before the complaint was raised) responded with a statement complaining about “derogatory or offensive language,” described Mr Edwards’ alleged comments as “unacceptable.” Continued overleaf