SLAS Times 2016/2017 Fall 2016 | Page 14

T E C H N O L O G Y P O L I C Y B Y E M M A W O O T A N A T Ever since cell phones and mobile devices started becoming easier to obtain, schools have had to try and keep control of their student’s academic environment while incorporating this new social and academic device. Experts from all over the world are debating whether a strict or lenient technology policy is better for students. At Shanghai Livingston American School (SLAS) there is a strict policy in place to prevent students from misusing cell phones on campus. Before discussing pros and cons of using technology at school, the technology that is already being provided to students as a resource must be looked at. In an interview Mr. Mark O’Gorman, the Director of IT, briefly laid out the current technology at the school, “We have two computer labs, one for primary and one for middle and high school. Both labs have stand alone computers connected to a master VPN that allows students free search. Eight ipads and nine laptops are available for daily loan.” SLAS does have technology available for students, which balances with their policy that cell phones should never be used in classrooms, not even as a resource. S L A S reduce textbook costs.” While this strategy worked out in Mays classroom it is impossible to tell whether the results could be replicated in classrooms globally. Here at SLAS, students can have conflicting opinions about the policy. In an interview James Chiang, a senior at SLAS, says he does not agree with the technology policy, “because it depends on the teacher. We are allowed to use other technology like computers and ipads so there is no difference.” When asked if he thought the school would ever changes their policy he said, “no, they are too traditional.” There are many concerns about allowing students free reign over their cell phone use. The EPA is especially concerned about the harmful effects that come from wireless devices and computer screens. The internet can also be dangerous as it contains inappropriate material and can be a distraction from school. Students can also be exposed to cyber bullying on the internet. One of the main reasons that schools don’t allow cell phones is that they can also be used for cheating. Tinder and Bahlander surveyed 269 college students from 21 academic majors and found that 95% of the students bring their phone to class everyday, 92% of the students use their phones to Many schools are now allowing students to use their text during class and 10% of the students admitted cell phones on a variety of levels. They argue that the to texting during an exam. benefits of utilizing cell phones as a resource far outweigh the potential risks. Cell phones can be used It is difficult to find a balance between staying up to as emergency tools, reminders, access to the internet date on progress and staying with traditions that have and communication. James May, a professor at worked in the past. It is up to the administration of Valencia College, tested these benefits out in his own every school to listen to the students and teachers classroom, “I have employed a variety of Web 2.0 and and then make decisions that are best for their specific smart device technologies and strategies in my school. There will probably never be a clear answer classroom. The approach has allowed me to model on the effects of technology, at least not for some transitive thinking and learning, employ brain based time. Until then, decisions have to be made using learning practices, better engage my students and discretion. 14