Senwes Scenario December 2016 / January 2017 | Page 23

••• •• T RA D E N E W S •• moisture content, mechanical resistance, soil chemistry, organic material, alkalinity, KUK, plant-available water retention ability, soil depth and hydraulic conductivity. 2.4 Crop variables Crop density, plant height, plant nutrition (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, C, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu); plant water congestion, plant biophysical characteristics, leaf area index (LAI), interception, photosynthetic active radiation and biomass; plant leaf chlorofil content and grain quality. 2.5 Other variables Weeds, insect infestation, nematodes, diseases and mechanical damage due to weather conditions. 2.6 Management variables Tillage, fertilisation, crop rotation, application of herbicides, irrigation, etc. MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY OF VARIABLES Precision farming record keeping will allow the farmer more accurate application of fertiliser and chemicals, which will decrease input costs and increase yields. A more practical explanation is that precision farming allows the manager to note and change farming activities in a more accurate manner. It is known as the management of variables. The management of variables can be done by means of a map-based approach or a sensor-based approach. The map-based approach is normally easier to apply and is based on the following: • Timetable-based random sampling of the field • Laboratory analyses of the soil • A specific map of soil types, yield, etcetera, of a field • Using this map-based approach to apply variable rate application. The sensor-based approach concentrates on the direct plant and soil characteristics to a larger degree and is based on the following:: • Real-time sensors • Using real-time sensors, which are physically placed in the field, in order to apply variable rate application. The use of these methods, irrespective of the approach which can be followed, offers a reliable instrument for the assessment of agricultural risk as well as the scheduling of every-day farming activities. The direct economic benefits which relate to the application of precision farming on farm level are normally difficult to calculate. For this reason it is of the utmost importance to measure the profitability which precision farming can pose on a total farm basis and not as individual operational units. This means that all the farming units and resource limitations where precision farming is applied, will have to be taken into account. In this manner the use of precision farming technology will indicate possible profit maximising potential, as well as the potential to decrease risk. Farmers can do an economic analysis, based on the variation of crop yield, in order to obtain an accurate determination of risk. For example, the farmer can determine that 70% of the time 75% of the oats on a specific field will deliver a yield of 3,8 tons per hectare. If the farmer is aware of his input cost per hectare, a more accurate profit margin per hectare can be calculated beforehand. These benefits go hand in hand with the accurate record-keeping made possible by precision farming technology. For further information, contact Vossie by email at lfvanstraaten@ gmail.com * Vossie van Straaten is a masters degree student in Soil Science * Luan van der Walt is an economist at Grain SA SENWES Scenario • DEC 2016/JAN 2017 21