( d) In light of the ITC’ s finding that the serious injury substantially caused by imports to the domestic industry producing a like or directly competitive article does not result from the reduction or elimination of any duty provided for under the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement, I determine, as part of the action taken in this proclamation under section 203 of the Trade Act( 19 U. S. C. 2253), not to suspend the reduction or elimination of any duty on imports of QSP that are the product of Israel, pursuant to section 403 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984( 19 U. S. C. 2112 note).
( e) In light of the ITC’ s finding that imports of QSP that are the product of the Republic of Korea are not a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof, I determine that such imports that are the product of the Republic of Korea shall be excluded from the action taken in this proclamation, pursuant to section 341( b) of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act( Public Law 112-41, 125 Stat. 428, 459( 2011))( 19 U. S. C. 3805 note).
( f) In light of the ITC’ s finding that imports of QSP that are the product of Panama are not a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof, I determine that such imports that are the product of Panama shall be excluded from the action taken in this proclamation, pursuant to section 331( b) of the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act( Public Law 112-43, 125 Stat. 497, 529( 2011))( 19 U. S. C. 3805 note).
( g) In light of the ITC’ s finding that imports of QSP that are the product of Peru are not a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof, I determine that such imports that are the product of Peru shall be excluded from the action taken in this proclamation, pursuant to section 331( b) of the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act( Public Law 110-138, 121 Stat. 1455, 1486( 2007))( 19 U. S. C. 3805 note).
( h) In light of the ITC’ s finding that imports of QSP that are the product of Singapore are not a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof, I determine that imports of QSP that are the product of Singapore are not a substantial cause of the serious injury found by the ITC. I therefore determine that such imports that are the product of Singapore shall be excluded from the action taken in this proclamation, pursuant to section 331( b) of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act( Public Law 108-78, 117 Stat. 948, 970( 2003))( 19 U. S. C. 3805 note).
( i) In light of the ITC’ s finding that the serious injury substantially caused by imports to the domestic industry producing a like or directly competitive article does not result from dutyfree treatment provided under the CBERA provisions of the Caribbean Basin Initiative trade program, I determine, as part of the action taken in this proclamation under section 203 of the Trade Act( 19 U. S. C. 2253), not to suspend duty-free treatment pursuant to section