SciArt Magazine - All Issues | Page 33

administration’s own hidden objectives. It deliberately referenced the well-known Simons and Chabris animation about inattention blindness, Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events, but with significant differences, involving politics and emotion. My experience has been that most viewers do not see the disappearing antiquities on first viewing. I found it instructive that a few people were able to perform accurate counting and also see the antiquities disappear. They attributed this ability to their training in art, and my take is that art can play a significant part in the process of informal learning. PS: You were involved with the Pratt Institute’s “Sleuthing the Mind” (2014), an exhibition wherein artists showcased works that engaged neuroscience. How did your work as curator and showcasing artist in “Sleuthing the Mind” fit into your oeuvre? granted. Aesthetic considerations were a priority. PS: What should the sciart community expect from you in the near future? Are there any new ideas, interests, and concepts that have piqued your attention? EKL: My recurrent pursuit is how we see the past in the present. I am in the initial stages of work with a software programmer to create an interactive environment and continue with the same themes in both static and dynamic media. New Niches—it might also be called Strange Bedfellows—focuses on the changing of traits as nature and technology co-exist and are mutually transformed. I tend to look at art works in terms of what they might add to the world. As George Kubler showed in The Shape of Time, artists invent new conventions and modify old ones, revealing art itself as an adaptive process. For me it is more to the point to look for meaning in the vertiginous treatment of space, remixes, and reconceived contexts and forms rather than search for formal purity. I think that the creative ability to imagine things and situations that do not yet fully exist has survival value. EL: Pratt invited me to curate an exhibition about art and neuroscience; it followed upon my being part of a small art and neuroscience workshop spearheaded by Marina Abramović and Robert Wilson. One of the questions raised was whether and how art can provoke a change of behavior through self-reflection. The artists explored the mind’s many facets through video, performance, human-computer interface, and View more of Levy’s work at: virtual reality along with traditional approaches http://complexityart.com/ that offered an expanded field of artistic practice informed by current neuroscience. The artists constructed experiences, many disorienting, in which we might intuit what it means for minds to be divided, aroused, recalibrated, or rewired. The minimal criteria for inclusion was, since well over 90% of the processes that are in our brains are automatic, to locate art works that might raise them to conscious awareness. In this sense the exhibition functioned like an informal experiment, although no data was collected. Visitors interacted with a number of the works, and some became aware of Installation of “Sleuthing the Mind.” Pratt Manhattan Gallery, NYC. September 16 - Nov. processes normally taken for 5, 2014. Photo Credit:  M. Alexander Weber. Left to right: works by Nene Humphry, Hans Breder, Michael Metz, Patricia Olynyk, and Nicole Ottiger. Image courtesy of the artist. SciArt in America February 2015 33