SASLJ Vol. 2 No. 2 | Page 90

Curriculum: Thirty Years Later Blackburn At present, deaf children desperately need an effective way to learn to read English texts and ASL gloss is poised as a reading instruction approach that is sensitive to the linguistic comprehension and decoding needs for the education of deaf children. One way or another, all children, with or without disabilities, deserve the opportunity to become fluent readers and to achieve that, attention needs to focus on best practices for deaf children and learning to read (p. 48). References Johnson, R. C. (1990). The publication and early aftermath of unlocking the curriculum. Sign Language Studies, 69, 295-325. Johnson, R. E., Liddell, S. K., & Erting, C. J. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Preparing America’s students for success. (n.d.). Common core state standards initiative: Preparing America’s students for college and career. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org. Supalla, S. J. (2017). A sketch on reading methodology for deaf children. Society for American Sign Language Journal, 1(1), 35-55. Supalla, S. J., & Blackburn, L. (2003). Learning how to read and bypassing sound. Odyssey, 5(1), 50-55. Supalla, S. J., & Byrne, A. P. J. (2018). Reading, special education and deaf children. Society for American Sign Language Journal, 2(1), 36-53. Supalla, S. J., Wix, T. R., & McKee, C. (2001). Print as a primary source of English for deaf learners. In J. Nicol & T. Langendoen (Eds.), One mind, two languages: Studies in bilingual language processing (pp. 177-190). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. VanBinsbergen, D. (1990). One teacher’s response to “Unlocking the Curriculum.” Sign Language Studies, 69, 327-331. SASLJ, Vol. 2, No. 2 – Fall/Winter 2018 90