Saint Olave's Law Society Journal ; Issue 01 (Autumn 2013) | Page 30
Saint
Olave’s
Law
Society
Journal
NON-?FICTION
What
About
Law?;
C.
Barnard,
J.
Sullivan,
G.
Virgo:
Whilst
an
introductory
text
to
studying
law,
the
information
in
this
book
focuses
predominantly
on
ascertaining
whether
law
is
the
right
career
for
the
reader,
and
how
to
hone
the
specific
skills
the
study
of
law
requires.
Through
seven
case
studies,
the
text
touches
on
the
main
areas
of
a
qualifying
law
degree,
including
tort,
contract
and
constitutional
law
and
encourages
the
reader
to
‘think
like
a
lawyer’.
In
addition,
some
of
the
broader
social,
economic
and
political
influences
explored
in
the
book
offer
a
contextual
overview
on
the
legal
world.
Learning
the
Law;
G.
Williams:
Williams’
concise
knowledge
of
the
essential
principles
of
English
law
is
condensed
into
this
readable
text.
A
popular
point
of
reference
for
the
majority
of
undergraduate
law
students,
topics
covered
in
this
book
outline
the
distinction
between
common
and
civil
law,
as
well
as
equity
and
statutes.
In
addition,
the
book
offers
potential
law
students
detailed
insight
into
courtroom
procedures.
Eve
Was
Framed;
H.
Kennedy:
Helena
Kennedy
QC
is
best
known
for
her
prolific
history
in
human
rights
advocacy
-?
in
particular
the
‘extraordinary
rendition’
of
the
Binyam
Mohammed
case
in
2009.
Kennedy
uses
Eve
Was
Framed
to
focus
on
the
role
of
women
in
the
law,
controversially
pinpointing
examples
to
support
her
belief
that
that
male
legislators
and
male
judges
fence
women
in
various
stages
of
social
and
economic
inequality.
The
African
Human
Rights
Court:
a
Two-Legged
Stool?;
M.
Mutua:
Mutua’s
comprehensive
synopsis
of
the
divergence
between
the
African
Court
of
Human
Rights
and
the
International
court
of
Human
Rights
outlines
the
way
in
which
our
conception
of
Human
Rights
could
change
in
the
near
future.
The
potential
impact
of
Western
influence
and
post-?colonial
culture
have
had
on
the
African
charter
is
also
explored
in
detail.
Central
Issues
in
Jurisprudence;
N.
Simmonds:
This
text
focuses
on
the
philosophy
of
law;
namely,
the
law
as
it
relates
to
morality
and
how
to
define
our
rights.
Is
there
a
divergence
between
the
rights
we
are
born
with
and
the
rights
we
earn?
If
so,
how
do
you
classify
to
whom
a
certain
type
of
right
is
accessible?
Do
we
really
have
absolute
rights
over
property,
and
is
there
an
innate
principle
we
need
to
consider
in
tackling
the
classification
of
different
laws?
Both
sides
of
the
argument
are
discussed;
the
‘right’
one
is
at
the
discretion
of
the
reader.
Issue
01
Autumn
2013
30