Saint David's Magazine Vol. 34 No 1 | Page 6

another? Were the fundamental truths Jefferson believed in grounded in a consistent framework? Hamilton was born into poverty and yet advocated for an aristocratic government. Jefferson believed in preservation of individual liberties yet owned slaves. These ideological inconsistencies offer us a framework that serves us through the entire year. Each president or congressional action we dissect is subjected to the same level of questioning as we search for the true purpose behind their actions. Primary sources are a critical tool as we investigate the differing perspectives of historical events. There are always a multitude of questions to ask regarding a primary source that go beyond the obvious “What does it say?” A few come to mind: Who wrote or created it? Who was the intended audience? What larger historical events was the author experiencing at the time? What was their emotional state? Was it edited or intended for publication? The list goes on. This constant questioning that I ask the boys to partake in creates a sense of mystery around each document and a desire to search for the truth. Each answer leads to a new question, a new idea, a new theory.  Our Hamilton and Jefferson unit ends with an examination of a letter Hamilton writes to a Massachusetts congressman to convince him to vote for Jefferson over Burr in the 6  •  Saint David’s Magazine unfortunate tie of the presidential election of 1800. The boys are amazed at the respect Hamilton has for Jefferson and the effusive quotations they pull as evidence call to question the animosity the boys assumed existed between these political rivals. Suddenly a historical figure the boys see as cemented in history, whose legacy is seemingly already set, is up for debate again. They learn through constant questioning that although the events of history are stubbornly unchanging, our understanding of them is, and should be, constantly in a state of flux. Our Hamilton and Jefferson unit helps our boys to appreciate different perspectives and underlines the importance of the ability to carry on a conversation with someone who disagrees with you. Hamilton and Jefferson did not always get along (whether in song, dance, or real life) but they did have a deep respect for each other. The discovery of this truth, through a close examination of primary sources coupled with our Socratic seminars, helps create students who understand the importance of engaging in different perspectives as they seek to cultivate their own nascent political identities. M Joe Shapiro is Chair of the History Department at Saint David’s School.