SAEVA Proceedings 2016 | Page 54

  By assessing the vertical amplitude of movement of the tuber coxae of each hemipelvis throughout the stride and comparing the left and right hemipelvis movements By assessing the extension angle of the fetlock (fetlock drop) of each hindlimb during maximum weightbearing and comparing left and right hindlimbs By assessing the position of the head during the weightbearing phase of each hindlimb and comparing between left and right hindlimbs By assessming various joint angles and stride length and foot flight characteristics (less useful). An important principle in the recognition of hindlimb lameness is the concept of the pelvic hike or hip hike. Since the horse has two “hips” and only one pelvis, the term pelvic hike is more accurate. Pelvic hike is the vertical elevation of the pelvis when the lame limb is weight bearing. In other words, the entire pelvis “hikes” upward when the lame limb hits the ground and moves downward when the sound limb hits the ground. It is the shifting of weight or load that occurs as the horse tries to reduce weight bearing (unload) in the lame limb and transfer weight (load) to the sound limb. This difference is best observed by tracking the movement of the top of the croup region (both tubera sacralia) throughout the entire stride. Many horses with hindlimb lameness (certainly not all) drift away from the lame limb toward the sound limb. Drifting is one of the earliest adaptive responses of a horse with unilateral hindlimb lameness, allowing the horse to break over more easily or to reduce load bearing. Drifting may decrease the magnitude of the observed pelvic hike, but more important, it makes the lame side look lower than the sound side. This is why it is important to watch the entire pelvis as a unit rather than the individual sides of the “hips.” Many driven STBs with hindlimb lameness drift away from the lame limb or are “on the shaft.” Horses with LH lameness have a tendency to be on the right shaft and vice versa. In horses with hindlimb lameness the normal symmetrical vertical movements of both quarters, as observed by focusing on the vertical displacement of the tuber coxae of each hemipelvis from behind the horse, is disturbed. The quarter on the lame side will rise and fall through a greater range of motion (increased vertical amplitude of movement of the tuber coxae) than that of the sound limb. This is usually characterized by a long downwards drop of the tuber coxae of the lame limb during the swingphase of the stride, followed by a fast, sudden, upwards flick, or hike of the tuber coxae of the lame limb, during the weightbearing phase of the stride. The degree of lameness is subjectively assessed and recorded on a numerical scale. To help the investigator, hip markers can be applied to aid the recognition of asymmetry of hindlimb movement in cases which are only slightly lame (May and Wyn-Jones 1987). Pain-related lameness will result in a reduction in the extension of the metatarsophalangeal joint providing there is no disruption of the palmar soft tissue supporting structures, hence making this sign a useful predictor 15-­‐18  February  2016      East  London  Convention  Centre,  East  London,  South  Africa     53