SAEVA Proceedings 2016 | Page 24

  D. Bilateral ovariectomy The ovaries can be removed: Under general anaesthesia via a ventral abdominal midline incision or a Para inguinal approach a standing flank laparoscopy, laparotomy or by colpotomy. The standing laparoscopy is now most commonly practiced in our area. Hooper et al. (16) found that after bilateral ovariectomy, 35% of the mare continued to show oestrous behaviour after surgery. Kim and Hendrickson showed 78% client satisfaction in mares with bilateral ovariectomy as a treatment for behavioural problems. The most common source of dissatisfaction for owners of patients with behavioural problems was the lack of behavioural change after surgery, including continued signs of oestrous behaviour. Ovariectomy offers the advantage of being a potentially permanent solution to a cycle-related behaviour problem but there are significant disadvantages as well. The procedure is relatively expensive, though when compared to repeated hormonal treatments, the cost may in fact be comparable. There are also risks associated with the surgical procedure. (16,17) The permanency of the procedure can also be a significant disadvantage as all possibilities for future reproduction are eliminated. It is important to note that, if the performance problem is truly related to oestrus, removing the ovaries may not solve the problem as mares can continue to display oestrous behaviour. It is possible that estradiol is of adrenal origin since sexual steroids are also produced by the adrenal cortex in response to ACTH. Therefore, this option should be weighed carefully before proceeding with ovariectomy. One way of evaluating the potential effectiveness of ovariectomy for a behavioural problem is to evaluate the mare’s behaviour during either a natural (i.e., seasonal) or induced anovulatory state (e.g. down regulation with a GnRH agonist); if the problem is not resolved or at least significantly improved during the anovulatory state, it is unlikely ovariectomy will be any more efficacious. CONCLUSIONS: If a behaviour or performance problem in a mare is defined as an oestrous cyclerelated problem, oestrus suppression methods can be considered. There is not such a thing as a perfect method to suppress oestrous in the mare, so advantages and potential disadvantages should be weighed for each individual animal, owner and trainer. References: 1. Freedman LJ, Garcia MC, Ginther OJ. Influence of photoperiod and ovaries on seasonal reproductive activity in mares. Biol Reprod 1979; 20 :567–74. 2. Ginther OJ. Folliculogenesis during the transitional period and early ovulatory season in mares. J Reprod Fertil 1990 ; 90:311–20. 3. Ginther OJ. Occurrence of anestrus, estrus, diestrus, and ovulation over a 12-month period in mares. Am J Vet Res 1974 ; 35:1173–9. 4. HartPJ,SquiresEL,ImelKJ,NettTM.Seasonalvariationin hypothalamic content of gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH), pituitary receptors for GnRH, and pituitary con- tent of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in the mare. Biol Reprod 1984; 30:1055–62. 5. Asa CS, Goldfoot DA, Garcia MC, Ginther OJ. Sexual behavior in ovariectomized and seasonally anovulatory pony mares (Equus caballus). Horm Behav 1980; 14:46–54. 6. Asa CS, Goldfoot DA, Carcia MC, Ginther OJ. Dexamethasone suppression of sexual behavior in the ovariectomized mare. Horm Behav 1980; 14:55–64. 7. Crowell–Davis SL. Sexual behavior of mares. Horm Behav 2007; 52 :12–17. Proceedings  of  the  South  African  Equine  Veterinary  Association  Congress  2016   23