SAEVA Proceedings 2016 | Page 225

  FOOT IMAGING - WHAT HAS MRI TAUGHT US? Michael Schramme VetAgro Sup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy L’Etoile, Rhône-Alpes, France Introduction New imaging modalities and advancements in older, commonly used modalities are providing a more accurate diagnosis of lameness in equine patients. These new techniques are increasing understanding of disease and leading to earlier identification and intervention. Advanced imaging leads to a more specific diagnosis and specific diagnoses should lead to new methods of treatment. Given the plethora of techniques available however, the right choice of technique can be daunting. It should consider the strengths and limitations of each one and the economic circumstances of the patient. Advantages of MRI over conventional imaging Radiography has limitations when evaluating complex regions. Radiographs are twodimensional representations of three-dimensional objects. Multiple soft tissue and bone structures are superimposed on each other. Radiography provides little information about internal or recessed anatomy such as intra-articular ligaments. Radiography relies on recognition of disrupted or altered contours, size or shape changes and abnormal radiopacity. Some of these signs are best seen when the Xray beam is tangential or parallel to the margins of a structure, producing a profile with minimum superimposition. Radiopacity changes may not be visible until mineral loss is advanced (>30%). Diagnostic ultrasonography also has many limitations. Deep structures situated beneath bone, gas or large vascular structures are poorly visualized. Sonography is a dynamic evaluation process. It is difficult to impossible to infer the context and relation of the structure of interest to the surrounding anatomy from still images. Sonography can only evaluate the surface of bone structures. MRI does not use ionizing radiation to produce medical images. It produces a greyscale image of hydrogen protons in tissues, based on the measurable energy release when protons alter their orientation in a large magnetic field. The higher the amount of free water and the higher the rotational freedom of hydrogen protons in a tissue, the higher the signal strength generated by that structure. Therefore MRI has high intrinsic contrast and resolution, resulting in good anatomic separation between different tissues (tendon, ligament, cartilage, bone, joint fluid). In particular the superior soft tissue contrast and anatomical detail have high diagnostic value. Next to anatomic information, MRI also displays information that is primarily physiologic or pathophysiologic. As a cross-sectional imaging modality, MRI is able to scan an object in any plane. The main disadvantages of MRI are its cost (installation and running costs), its still limited availability and the need for specialist training. As there is a bewildering Proceedings  of  the  South  African  Equine  Veterinary  Association  Congress  2016   224