SAEVA Proceedings 2016 | Page 133

  Horse embryos can be transferred to the recipient mare’s uterus in the medium in which they were recovered. However, it is more usual to transfer the embryo in a ‘holding medium’ to which it has been moved via a series of ‘washes’. The holding medium is a better environment for the embryo in case of any delay in performing the transfer, while the washing steps help dilute out any microorganisms either introduced during embryo recovery or already present in the uterus of the donor mare; it is not uncommon to recover an embryo from an obviously infected uterus. Transcervical transfer of an embryo is usually performed using a “cassou” type transfer pipette, after loading the embryo into either a 0.25ml or 0.5ml straw. The choice of straw size and pipette type is largely a question of operator preference, but is also influenced by embryo size; small embryos are easier to pick up in a 0.25ml straw, but large embryos may not fit into the straw or out of the pipette opening (Jasko 2002). Aternat ively, horse embryos (in particular large ones) can be transferred using a sterile insemination pipette (Wilsher and Allen 2004). In all cases, the straw is loaded with three columns of fluid separated by air spaces, with the embryo in the second column; the first fluid column serves to lubricate the pipette exit, while the third ensures that the embryo is flushed out of, and away from, the pipette. The exact technique used to manipulate the transfer pipette through the cervix and into the uterus differs between operators. Nevertheless, the essentials are to ensure that the pipette enters the uterus without the accompaniment of contaminants picked up from the recipient’s vulva or vagina, and with minimal trauma to the cervical canal and endometrium. Contamination is minimized by enclosing the pipette in a sterile plastic sheath (‘chemise’) within which it is introduced into the external os of the cervix. Once in the cervix, the sheath is pulled slowly but firmly backwards while the pipette is maintained in place, such that the sheath tears and the sterile pipette alone is advanced through the cranial portion of the cervix and into the uterine lumen. Besides tearing the chemise at the correct moment, the dexterity required for transcervical ET is the ability to manoeuvre the pipette through the constricted cervical canal without excessive dilation or trauma; this manipulation can be facilitated by grasping the protruding portion of the cervix firmly between two fingers and pulling it backwards so that it straightens. Alternatively, Wilsher and Allen (2004) have described the use of a duck-billed speculum to visualize, and a modified rat-toothed Velsellum forceps to grasp and straighten, the cervix; this has the same overall effect as the manipulation described above but requires less dexterity, although it does involve more operators. Transrectal palpation to direct the transfer pipette further into a uterine horn is probably unnecessary, but may be helpful if there doubts as to whether the pipette has passed through the internal cervical os and into the uterine lumen. 15-­‐18  February  2016      East  London  Convention  Centre,  East  London,  South  Africa     132