SAEVA Proceedings 2015 | Page 35

South African Equine Veterinary Association Congress 2015  Protea Hotel  Stellenbosch response to treatments.Unfortunately, variation within and between observers makes this subjective analysis of gait more problematic (Olsen et al. 2014). The following neurological disorders should be considered potential differential diagnoses and may produce signs similar to or indistinguishable from CSM: equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM), equine degenerative myeloencephalopathy (EDM), equine herpes virus I myelitis, occipito-atlantoaxial malformation, spinal cord trauma, vertebral fracture, vertebral abscess or neoplasia, and verminous myelitis. Horses with traumatic cervical vertebral disorders usually exhibit pain during manipulation or palpation of the neck, and the disorder may sometimes be differentiated from CSM by standing radiographic examination. Occipito-atlantoaxial malformation occurs primarily in Arabian horses and is diagnosed definitively by radiographic examination. Equine degenerative myeloencephalopathy is diagnosed by exclusion (unremarkable cerebrospinal fluid cytological examination, negative immunoblot analysis for Sarcocystis neurona, and negative radiographic and myelographic examination). The veterinarian may suspect EDM based on the age (usually less than 18 months) and during neurological examination but definitive diagnosis is only achieved by post-mortem examination. Although several breeds have been reported with the disease, EDM appears to have a familial predisposition in Standardbred horses. Horses with equine herpes virus I myelitis may have urinary incontinence, poor tail tone and pelvic limb lower motor neuron weakness. Signs associated with cranial nerve involvement may occasionally be observed. In EHV1 myelitis, CSF evaluation typically reveals xanthochromia and albuminocytological dissociation (high protein, normal cell count); a rising or already markedly elevated EHV1 serum antibody titre, virus isolation and PCR diagnosis all can be used to provide supportive evidence of herpes virus I myelitis. In areas where EPM is endemic (such as North and South America) or in horses imported from these regions, distinguishing between EPM and CSM can be hard. Asymmetrical signs such as focal sweating and regional muscle atrophy should direct diagnostic efforts toward EPM, however symmetrical spinal ataxia does not preclude a diagnosis of EPM. EPM-affected horses with symmetrical ataxia are differentiated from those with CSM on the basis of standing radiographic evaluation, CSF immune-diagnostic analysis for S. neurona, and in some circumstances, myelographic evaluation (see comments on equine myelography below). Cytological analysis of CSF is usually unremarkable in horses with CSM, although mild xanthochromia or slightly increased protein concentration can be observed in affected horses especially if signs have developed acutely, perhaps precipitated by trauma. Diagnostic testing Plain radiography of the cervical vertebrae can be used to assess the likelihood of cervical stenotic myelopathy in horses with spinal ataxia (Moore et al. 1994), but accurate assessment requires a precise lateral radiograph, (Rush 1998) ensuring that the ventral prominences of the transverse processes are perfectly overlying each other. Radiographic obliquity results in indistinct margins of the ventral aspect of the vertebral canal, and results in erroneous values for objective measurements. A thorough understanding of the 3 dimensional anatomy of the cervical vertebrae aids in interpretation (Withers et al. 2009). Cervical radiographs should be evaluated subjectively and objectively. Subjective interpretation is based on examining for presence of five characteristic malformations of the cervical vertebrae that include (1) flare of the caudal epiphysis of the vertebral body; (2) abnormal ossification of the articular processes; (3) subluxation / misalignment between adjacent vertebrae; (4) extension of the vertebral caudal dorsal lamina and (5) osteoarthritis of the articular processes. Estimating the significance of lesions identified through subjective interpretation can be hard and is based on the clinician‟s experience and interpreting the balance of probability. For example, osteoarthritis of (especially the caudal) vertebral articular processes is recognised commonly in normal horses (Whitwell and Dyson 1987). Hence recognition of characteristic vertebral malformations is considered supportive in 35