SAEVA Proceedings 2014 | Page 17

46TH  ANNUAL  CONGRESS  OF  THE  SAEVA        SKUKUZA      16-­‐20  FEBRUARY  2014   17     Intra-articular corticosteroid injections may predispose to fungal osteitis although the actual frequency of occurrence in horses is unknown (Sherman et al. 2006). Sequestrum formation has also been described following PSB osteitis, and contrary to the rapid healing of sequestra in long bones of horses that undergo surgical treatment, PSB sequestration carries a prolonged healing period (Dunkerley et al. 1997). Debate exists on the long-term outcome and prognosis of axial osteitis. Several studies indicate a poor prognosis for return to full work (Richardson & Dyson 2011; Wisner et al. 1991) whilst others indicate a more favourable prognosis for the aseptic form treated with arthroscopic debridement (Dabareiner et al. 2001). Five out of 6 horses in Dabareiner et al.'s (2001) study that returned to work had the aseptic form, and all had arthroscopic debridement as part of their treatment protocol. In Wisner’s (1991) study, none of the seven horses returned to work, however, none had surgical intervention. Only three of the seven horses underwent treatment, which consisted of systemic antibiotics and metacarpophalangeal joint lavage. Septic forms generally carry a poor prognosis and the general consensus appears to be that of a poor to guarded prognosis (Sedrish et al. 1996; Dunkerley et al. 1997; Wisner et al. 1991). Lawrence and Fraser (2013) reported findings on two foals with septic axial osteitis in which a successful outcome was obtained with the use of oral doxycycline, which is not an antibiotic administered previously for this condition. Unfortunately the effect of axial osteitis on sesamoid strength and future athletic performance is not known despite resolution in the two foals, as they were not old enough to enter training at the time of the reported findings (Lawrence & Fraser 2013). In conclusion, axial osteitis is a clinical entity in which the imaging findings are well documented and rewarding, but treatment and long term outcome is often disappointing and a poor prognosis can be expected in the majority of cases. References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.   Barclay, W.P., Foerner, J.J. & Phillips, T.N., 1985. Axial sesamoid injuries associated with lateral condylar fractures in horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 186(3), pp.278–279. Barr, E.D. et al., 2005. Destructive lesions of the proximal sesamoid bones as a complication of dorsal metatarsal artery catheterization in three horses. Veterinary Surgery, 34, pp.159–166. Butler, J. et al., 2000. Clinical Radiology of the Horse 2nd ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, United Kingdom. Cornelissen, B.P., Rijkenhuizen, A.B. & Barneveld, A., 1996. The arterial shift features in the equine proximal sesamoid bone. Veterinary Quarterly, 18(2), pp.S110–S116. Cornelissen, B.P.M. et al., 2002. A study on the pathogenesis of equine sesamoiditis: the effects of experimental occlusion of the sesamoidean artery. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 49(5), pp.244–50. Dabareiner, R.M. et al., 2001. Osteitis of the axial border of the proximal sesamoid bones in horses: eight cases (1993-1999). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 219(1), pp.82–6. Dennis, R. et al., 2010. Handbook of Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound 2nd ed., Elsevier Ltd, St Louis. Denoix, J.M., Busoni, V. & Owlla, M., 1997. Ultrasonographic examination of the proximal scutum in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal, 29(2), pp.136–141. 17