SABI Magazine 2019 October-November | Page 28

Water Quality Suitability indicators to assess specific site, risk-based irrigation water quality by HM du Plessis 1 , JG Annandale 1 and N Benade 2 University of Pretoria 1 and NB Systems 2 I n the first of this two-paper series, we introduced readers to a newly developed electronic Decision Support System (DSS) that helps the user to assess the fitness for use of irrigation water (du Plessis et. al., 2019). In this paper, we provide an overview of the suitability indicators used by the DSS to assess the fitness for use of water for irrigation. The DSS provides the user with an assessment of how water of a given composition will affect soil quality, crop yield and quality, as well as irrigation equipment. Specific indicators were identi- fied with which to measure the suitability of irrigation water for its intended purpose and criteria have been established with which to categorise the effect on each suitability indicator. The criteria are used to quantify the effect that water constituents have on suit- ability indicators and categorise the effect as being either ideal, acceptable, tolerable or unac- ceptable. Throughout the DSS use is made of these (colour coded) fitness for use categories to clas- sify and display the suitability of irrigation water (see Table1). Table 1 A generic description of the fitness for use classification of irrigation water used by the DSS Fitness for use category 26 Description Ideal A water quality that would not normally impair the fitness of the water for its intended use Acceptable A water quality that would exhibit some impairment to the fitness of the water for its intended use Tolerable A water quality that would exhibit increasingly unacceptable impairment to the fitness of the water for its intended use Unacceptable A water quality that would exhibit unacceptable impairment to the fitness of the water for its intended use SABI | OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2019 The DSS allows the user to conduct either a rapid conserva- tive (Tier 1) or an extensive site- specific (Tier 2) evaluation of the suitability of a specific water for irrigation. Should the Tier 1 FFU assessment (that makes use of conservative assumptions) not indicate potential problems with any of the suitability indicators, the water is deemed fit for use on all crops, under all but the most exceptional circumstances. On the other hand, should the Tier 1 assessment identify potential problems with one or more of the suitability indicators, a more detailed, site specific assessment as provided by a Tier 2 assess- ment, is indicated. The Tier 2 assessment allows the user to select more appropriate site specific variables (such as crop, irrigation system and manage- ment, soil texture and climatic data) to simulate soil-plant- atmosphere interactions with a soil water and solute balance model, and produce a much more rigorous assessment of soil- crop-water interactions. Running the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model over several years, allows the calculation of the likelihood of yield and other parameters falling in different suitability categories. Suitability indicators of soil quality Four suitability indicators are used to evaluate the effect water constituents have on soil quality, namely root zone salinity, soil permeability, dissolved organic carbon loading and trace element accumulation. Salinity (salt content) within the root zone reduces crop growth by reducing the ability of plant roots to absorb water from soil. While the yield of some crops is already affected at low soil salinity levels, others display salt tolerance, with the result that the range of crops that can be successfully cultivated decreases as soil salinity increases. Root zone salinity is thus an impor- tant indicator of soil quality, and the crops that can be cultivated successfully under irrigation. The suitability of a soil for crop- ping is to a large degree deter- mined by its ability to conduct water and air (permeability) and on physical properties that control the friability of the seedbed (tilth). In general, increases in soil sodium concentrations cause a deterioration of soil physical properties. The undesirable