Rubberneck Issue 7 (September 2013) | Page 36

make someone else money) and things would be fine. Also, our culture is much, much more commercial than it was twenty, thirty years ago. Making money tops everything. Creativity in the service of commerce (commercial art, writing ad copy, the jingles that we call U2 and Black Eyed Peas songs) pays well. But....to answer your question: My friend Ryan Wells and I started Z Gun because we thought the world lacked a good print zine and we wanted to challenge ourselves to do a zine as good as Search & Destroy and Forced Exposure (why aim low?). We had sketched out a fourth issue but after six months of just a sketch we both knew it was over. We burned out (“better to burn out than to fade away”). Too much time, too many mediocre records coming our way, no desire to do it just to do it. Neither one of us are nostalgic sorts or care about the “Z Gun brand,” so figure it dead. So would you say those same reasons are what killed the Static Party blog that you two did together? That blog focused on ‘90s punk stuff, and there was definitely a sense that that material was overlooked more than what you referred to as the other “golden eras” of punk-- do you still think that’s true, or has it gotten its due more recently? What other “golden eras” of music do you think have been unjustly overlooked? Yeah, Static Party ran its course. When we started that blog, we definitely thought that 90s punk was under-appreciated. I am not sure if we were correct about it being a “golden era,” as we might have been too close to it to make that judgment. When we’d go through our collections to find stuff to post on Static Party, we were constantly running into great singles from the late 80s, a time period that has a bad rep for music. That isn’t surprising. There is good music being made all of the time and the quality to crap ratio is pretty mu