RocketSTEM Issue #2 - April 2013 | Page 37

the guidelines that they must be lightweight, fit inside the cabin of the command module for transportation and were fairly straightforward to deploy. These options were ultimately winnowed down into three finalists: (1) the extension of a sunshade across the exposed hull of the workshop, erected by means of a long pole affixed to the ATM, (2) a sunshade deployed from the command module’s hatch whilst station-keeping or (3) a sunshade deployed through Skylab’s solarfacing scientific airlock. Of these, Option 2 was the least technically complex, although its key obstacle was that Conrad, at the command module’s controls, would be forced to hold position alongside the workshop, whilst his colleagues opened the hatch to put the sunshade in position. The first option to erect such a shield would require additional EVA training. The third option would require the development of a shade which was capable of passing through a 20 cm3 opening and then unfurling to cover an area of 7 m2. It also meant that the scientific airlock would have to be sacrificed. Conrad’s crew had already done extensive EVA training on the ATM and felt that with the availability of suitable hand-holds and foot restraints, they could complete Option 1. Similarly, Option 3 was also ‘doable’, because they could at least work from within the pressurised – but very hot – confines of the workshop itself. At length, since no one knew if the scientific airlocks were cluttered with debris, Option 3 was ranked last. Johnson Space Center set to work on Option 2, and the Marshall Space Flight Center explored Option 1. The Houston group envisaged a scenario in which an astronaut (probably Weitz) would perform a stand-up EVA (SEVA) in the open hatch of the command module and attach the sunshade in two places to the aft section of Skylab. Conrad would then manoeuvre his spacecraft to the forward end of the station, deploying the shade in the process and finally Weitz would www.RocketSTEM.org make a third attachment at the ATM. This sunshade very quickly gained the moniker of ‘SEVA sail’ and its development was conducted under the auspices of Caldwell Johnson. For ten days, his staff worked on the shade, seamstresses stitched the orange material, parachute packers folded it for deployment, engineers attended to its various fasteners…and a steady stream of public tours gawped from a mezzanine gallery at what was going on. Meanwhile, in Huntsville, the plan was to perform an EVA from the ATM itself. Their sunshade resembled a window blind and its design was completed on the evening of 15 May. Kerwin and the backup commander, Rusty Schweickart, flew to the Marshall Space Flight Center to participate in underwater EVA tests of both sunshades. “One by one,” recalled Schweickart of the exhaustive two-hourplus session, “we eliminated things and by about midnight…we basically had the outlines of what we were going to do.” The Huntsville sunshade needed further work and the design which steadily evolved was a configuration of two 14 m long poles, which would be ‘cantilevered’ from the ATM. The poles would be assembled from a dozen smaller sections, allowing them to fit inside the command module, and a rope would run along their length, through a series of eyelets. The 7 x 6 m sunshade would be unfurled by tugging on the rope in a similar fashion to hoisting a ship’s sail. This design came to be known as the ‘twin-pole’ sail. An underwater test by Schweickart and Kerwin on 18 May showed that it would work, but also indicated that its pole sections might separate under stress. A locking nut was modified, the shade’s weight was reduced and Teflon inserts were placed into the eyelets to reduce friction. Thereafter, the remainder of the work ran without a hitch. Meanwhile, the option to deploy a sunshade from the scientific airlock had been revived and was steadily gaining momentum, with Skylab: The Flown and Unflown Missions Skylab 1 The Skylab space station itself was launched into orbit on 14 May 1973. During ascent, one of the solar arrays was torn off, together with the micrometeoroid shield, and the second array was left jammed with debris. The launch of the first crew was delayed as NASA explored its options. Skylab 2 The first crew to the space station consisted of Pete Conrad (Commander), Joe Kerwin (Science Pilot) and Paul Weitz (Pilot). They were launched into orbit on 25 May 1973 and spent 28 days at Skylab. During their mission, they performed a dangerous spacewalk to install a new sunshade and open the jammed solar array. Continued on page 37 35 35