Revista Scientific Volumen 3 / Nº 7 - Febrero-Abril 2018 | Page 13

On the other hand, hermeneutic rationality (qualitative, approach, study, understand, analyze and build knowledge; from processes of interpretation where the validity and reliability of knowledge rests, ultimately, on the rigor of the researcher. The construction of knowledge is assumed as a subjective and intersubjective process. In the meantime, it is the subject who constructs the research design, collects the information, organizes it and gives it meaning from its previous conceptual structures; as well as the findings that arise from the research itself, which are then collectivized and discussed in the academic community. Erlandson, Harris, Skipper and Allen (1993), contrast traditional (quantitative) design with emergent design (typical of the inquiry derived from the naturalist paradigm). The difference between the two lies in the specificity of the original research plan. If qualitative research seeks to understand meanings; quantitative studies try to know little explored issues through the effectiveness of techniques. Stake (1999: 41), noted: “This distinction between quantitative and qualitative methods is a matter of emphasis - since reality is the mixture of one and the other. In any ethnographic, naturalistic, hermeneutical or holistic study (eg, in any qualitative study) the enumeration and recognition of the difference in quantity occupy a prominent place. And in any statistical study or controlled experiment (eg, in any quantitative study) the natural language with which they are described and the interpretation of the researched are important”. For Hashimoto and Saavedra (2014: 8), “The discussion has to focus on why I should or have to use that or another method, or in what I should look for or use that data or method”. That is the crux of the matter, to resolve this question is on the philosophical and not methodological level. 12 Editorial phenomenological, naturalistic, humanistic or ethnographic) seeks a way to