Editorial
Every research or research process requires the rational guidelines of
the person who prepares or produces the systematization of the information of
the phenomenon being studied. It implies materializing through writing not only
its formal elaboration but also the formulation of laws and construction of
concepts, models and theories on which scientific research work is based.
The final document and report represents the bulk of the ideas or the
conceptual theoretical support of its systematic construction during the course
of what is being researched, whether in the field of Natural Sciences or in which
it corresponds to the Humanities and Social Sciences.
It is worth reconsidering in principle what Martínez (2002a) has dealt
with: the subject-object relationship as part of the cognitive process from the
philosophical and psychological point of view when he says that "it is the
subject who shapes and shapes the perceived object ... "(page 89); through its
language materialized in the writing.
That same cognitive subject-object interaction affirms that the human
mind constructs, as an active and formative participant of what it knows, its
object, informing in writing the matter it deals with, as well as implying its culture
and the environment in which it lives. Ideas of transcendence that come from
the thought of Kant (1786) and that evidence at present, the application of the
linguistic intellectual capacity of the human being from his inner world in contact
with reality.
The approach in question responds to the specific vision that man has
to describe or explain what he observes according to the knowledge he has
about it and what he produces in practice to write.
Consequently, the writer consciously establishes what he has as
knowledge, meaning, structure and what he represents, what he is as a subject
12
Editorial
Writing in the Investigative Writing