ReSolution Issue 16, February 2018 | Page 3

ReSolution Issue No. 16
Contents

01 FROM THE EDITOR

3 RESOLUTION® IN BRIEF

09 Singapore High Court Dismisses Stay
Applicationson basis of
repudiatory breach of Med-Arb
agreements

14 Snapping the olive branch: when
expert determination clauses go wrong



19 Proposed amendments to the Thai Arbitration Act


24 Courts re-affirm their pro-
arbitration stance

27 Stinging judicial criticism,
loss of confidence and errors
of law not sufficient to set
aside an award


31 Case in Brief
Oao v Magneco Metrel UK Ltd [2017] EWHC 2208 (Comm)

Glencore Agriculture BV v Conqueror Holdings Ltd [2017] EWHC 2893 (Comm)

Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping & Trading Pte Singapore & Another [2017] EWCA Civ 1703

36 Letters to the Editor




**This publication has been optimised for online reading. The downloadable pdf version might not accurately reflect its actual online design.

EXPERT DETERMINATION FOR ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES

Model Clause: In the event of any dispute or difference arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the subject matter of this contract, including any question about its existence, validity or termination, the parties must refer that dispute in the first instance to Expert Determination in accordance with the Expert Determination Rules of the New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre.

To secure the appointment of an expert determiner contact NZDRC at [email protected]
nzdrc.co.nz