Reports Allegro CTRM Value Study Report 2014 | Page 12

CTRM Value Survey and Analysis

SUMMARY OF RESULTS – 2014 V 2013
Line

Description

2014

2013

1

Improved visibility into daily positions/exposures

4.5

4.1

2

Improved access to information for traders

4.1

3.9

3

Improved the visibility and access to logistical information and optionality for schedulers and/or
transportation/transmission personnel

3.9

3.5

4

Reduced the human effort associated with managing business

3.9

3.6

5

Reduced the number/scale of errors associated with data entry

4.1

4.1

6

Reduced time and effort in calculating valuations

4.0

3.9

7

Able to more readily react to industry changes due to Allegro

3.8

3.7

8

Able to develop an effective regulatory compliance program utilizing Allegro

3.9

3.3

9

System upgrade/maintenance effort and time have been reduced

2.9

2.6

10

Reduced our overall system cost since migrating to Allegro

3.0

2.9

11

Reduced time and effort required for month-end close process

3.8

3.9

12

Reduced errors associated with settlement and invoicing

4.0

4.0

13

Has the number of daily transactions increased since implementing Allegro?

75%

80%

14

Has the notional value of your transactions increased since implementing Allegro?

75%

71%

15

Have you expanded your footprint of Allegro by adding additional components?

67%

N/A

16

Has your business grown into new commodities/market since you implemented Allegro?

63%

50%

17

Did you implement Allegro when expanding your business into these new markets?

80%

80%

Copyright 2014

Commodity Technology Advisory llc

12