Renewable Energy Installer March 2014 | Page 8

News: Profi le Independence Day Over reliance on green government subsidies will fatally weaken the industry, argues Stephen Knight, Navitron ith over 500,000 homes and businesses currently benefi ting from government incentives like the Feed-In Tariff (FIT) and non-domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI), the eco/clean technology industry has seen a tremendous jump in the number of systems installed since the programmes were introduced. As a result of this success, many renewables companies and installers are now relying on the appeal of government incentives to sell their products and services to end-users. As proven with the shortcomings of and cuts to recent incentive-driven government schemes, and how these failings affected related industries, action must be take to prevent the bright lights and short-term gains from infl uencing the success of the renewables industry. W The case against government policies The demise of insulation specialists is a prime example of how reliance on public-funded schemes can have an adverse affect on a sector’s success. Prior to the implementation of the Green Deal during early 2013, many insulation companies were thriving due to successful government programmes that provided grants for insulation measures. Action must be take to prevent the bright lights and short-term gains from infl uencing the success of the renewables industry 8 | www.renewableenergyinstaller.co.uk However, once the Green Deal came into effect and policies changed, many businesses were left without the key selling point they’d been relying on for years. As a result, installation rates dropped by over 75 percent over the course of just 12 months. The double-glazing sector also fell foul to reliance after pinning their hopes on the success of the Green Deal – which was designed to offer loans and cash back for energy saving installations. During the introductory year, however, only one home utilised the Green Deal for double-glazing due to the policy’s restrictive funding criteria. We must rethink the way we sell to refl ect the ageless benefi ts renewable technology has to offer Beware of changes Currently, the renewables industry is in a very similar situation to those previously mentioned, with many solar electricity companies thriving due to the Feed-In Tariff and many solar heating businesses pinning their hopes onto the uncertain success of the domestic RHI incentive. Instead, as an industry, we must focus on changing end-user attitudes about the benefi ts of sustainability and encourage them to consider a switch to eco solutions. At the moment, it seems that most consumers believe we are selling a way to earn profi t through the government, which is not what we do. We sell ways to save money on utility bills while reducing a building’s overall environmental impact. Anything else is an added benefi t. Future proofi ng: The renewables sector cannot control its destiny if demand is too closely linked to government fi nancial incentives, says Navitron’s Stephen Knight To remedy this misconception, industry professionals should focus on emphasising the amount of money that can be saved on annual bills instead of how much can be earned through FIT or RHI incentives; by showing a building’s current carbon footprint compared to what it could be reduced to with renewable technology. Publicity surrounding government has clouded consumers’ views on renewable technologies, creating an unstable market based around uncertain elements. To fi x this, we must rethink the way we sell to refl ect the ageless benefi ts renewable technology has to offer. As easy as it is to rely on government incentives to bring in new business, it’s just not a sustainable way of growing as an industry. Instead, installers must sell the idea of green and savings, along with high-quality products, positive return on investment and reliable installations completed by friendly professionals. The double-glazing sector fell foul to reliance after pinning their hopes on the success of the Green Deal