Reflection Issue 27 | Page 61

Process The PDP process can be made explicit through a specific module; assignments with a focus on goals and tasks, however students feel they are going through the process of documenting evidence to reflect on and get feedback on to help them develop further. Bite size tasks could be organised following Bloom’s taxonomy of learning incorporating personal, academic and professional learning. Dialogue with tutors and peers in the ePortfolio environment is essential for tutor and student engagement with the process. Therefore, it is important that the academics are fully engaged in the process and see the provision of providing feedback important to enable the student to achieve to their full potential in addition to their assessment strategy, measuring achievement against learning outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates that introducing ePortfolios would help facilitate elements of PDP such as gathering and showcasing evidence, reviewing and ordering, reflective writing, social learning and action planning. Frith (2010) claims that engaging with this process provides a truer picture of the student’s skills and their capacity to capture and learn from their individual ‘learning journey’ implying that each discipline, and within that each student, can use ePortfolios differently. This work has led to the development of an Academic Tool Kit as a file of information to be stored on the University’s VLE. This Tool Kit offers guidance on the provision of PDP at 3 different levels within programmes; guidance on the use of ePortfolios based on the professional, employability or academic model (Clegg & Bradley 2006) and a chart of the comparative data for various tools available linked to champions of their use, to support the processes of identifying learning needs, recording, reviewing, evidencing and articulating student achievements. References Barnett, R. (2000) Supercomplexity and the curriculum, Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), pp. 255-265. Clegg, S. and Bradley, S. (2006), Models of PDP: practice and processes, British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), pp. 57-76. Floud, R. (2002), Higher education, the economy and society: developing vocational relevance, Universities UK Keynote speech, The Cavendish Conference Centre, London, 21 February 2002. Available from: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/speeches/show.asp?sp548 [Accessed 12 May 2012] Frith, L. (2010), How do different models of PDP influence the embedding of e-Portfolios? Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. Special Edition: Researching PDP Practice. pp. 1-15 HEFCE (2005). HEFCE Strategy for E-Learning, ref. 2005/12. Available from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/ (Last accessed June 2014) THE CENTRE FOR RECORDING ACHIEVEMENT 104 -108 WALLGATE, WIGAN, WN3 4AB | 61