Real Estate Investor Magazine South Africa July 2013 | Page 18

COVER STORY intervention of the courts, get an attorney to negotiate lesser payments with your creditors on your behalf,” advises Gerstner. If you are already in arrears with some of your creditors, enlist the help of a debt counsellor registered with theDCI immediately. Do not wait until you receive a Section 129 notice from a creditor, because that will exclude the particular debt from the protection you enjoy in terms of the NCA. Know you have rights No matter how deeply indebted you are, you have rights as a credit consumer and you should do everything in your power to ensure your rights are respected and upheld. For example, the NCA caps the rates of interest creditors may charge. The in duplum rule, as a pertinent case in point, prohibits interest charges that exceed the amount of the principle debt. In addition, if you cannot meet your debt repayments, section 129(1) of the NCA stipulates that the bank and the client must ‘develop and agree on a plan to bring the payments under the agreement up to date’, but this is often simply ignored by the banks and other credit providers. The Constitutional Court has ruled that it is unconstitutional for a bank to sell a home in execution where the debt is disproportionately low compared to the value of the home or to the amounts already paid in. In addition, only a judge - and not a high court registrar - can grant a judgment to a bank or issue a Writ of Execution, and only once the bank has shown that the sale of the property is justifiable, given all the circumstances of the particular case. Whatever amount is outstanding, Scott Cundill of NewERA warns: “Be particularly wary of the banks’ ‘quick-sell’ options for distressed homeowners and of signing any documents in which you admit indebtedness. These contracts often contain clauses through which the banks obtain your consent to judgment or to an auction, should your property not be sold on time. This leaves in you a serious quandary because you have unwittingly signed away all your rights.” Many consumers have also faced sheriffs of the court who act without the correct documentation and with undue force, sometimes aided and abetted by police officers, and who remove or attach property unlawfully. Sheriffs of the 16 July 2013 SA Real Estate Investor court are regulated by statute and have a code of conduct. They may not mislead the public or misrepresent themselves, or make unjustified threats. The UBUNTU Liberation Movement notes that people have rights to prevent their property from being taken against their will. As such, it has published a document “How to Deal with the Sheriff”, which is available on its website. It suggests that legal and lawful rights exists which a