RAPPORT ISSUE 5 | Page 6

RAPPORT The International Journal for Recording Achievement, Planning and Portfolios Issue 5 (August 2020) Editorial Rob Ward joined the first incarnation of the Centre for Recording Achievement – the Recording Achievement and Higher Education Project – at its inception in 1991. He is now Director Emeritus of the CRA. Email: [email protected] Janet Strivens took up the role of Senior Associate Director in 2004 after some years of acting as the CRA representative of the University of Liverpool. She is now an Honorary Senior Fellow in the Institute of Population Health at the University of Liverpool. Email: [email protected] In its twenty-seven year life the Centre for Recording Achievement became closely associated with the processes of planning and review that underpin Personal Development Planning as well as many related activities. At the same time, we were keen to stress that part of self – and career – management required individuals to make the most of opportunities which presented themselves ‘in the moment’. And it’s fair to say that this Special Edition of RAPPORT owes more to the latter perspective than the former. For its origins lie not in a plan to write for publication, but rather in an initiative concerned to support and improve practice in the field of Personal Tutoring and Academic Advising. The majority of contributions featured here centre upon work undertaken by colleagues across a diverse range of UK HEIs who undertook the national Professional Development Award in Personal Tutoring and Academic Advising, an award designed by the CRA in accordance with the relevant Staff and Educational Development Association (SEDA) rubric, accredited by SEDA, mapped to the UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF), and finally delivered by the CRA, running over three differing cohorts. This explicitly sought to offer an inclusive award centred upon the processes that exist to support student engagement and development. Our thinking in developing this initiative was timely. The increase in tuition fees and Government interest in placing ‘Students at the Heart of the System’ (BIS, 2011) ensured a renewed emphasis on the nature of the ‘offer’ made by 5