74 H. Murat et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 1), 65 – 75
Bouchareb Y, Tag N, Sulaiman H, Al-Riyami K, Jawa Z, Al-Dhuhli H. 2023. Optimization of BMI-based images for overweight and obese patients— implications on image quality, quantification, and radiation dose in whole body 18F-FDG PET / CT imaging. Nucl Med Molec Imag 57: 180 – 193.
Brenner DJ. 2012. We can do better than effective dose for estimating or comparing low-dose radiation risks. Ann ICRP 41( 3 – 4): 124 – 128.
Breustedt B, Giussani A, Noßke D. 2018. Internal dose assessments � concepts, models and uncertainties. Radiat Measurements. https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / J. RADMEAS. 2018.06.013
Choi HJ, Jang JW, Shin W-G., Park H, Incerti S, Min CH. 2020. Development of integrated prompt gamma imaging and positron emission tomography system for in vivo 3-D dose verification: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 65. https:// doi. org / 10.1088 / 1361-6560 / ab857c
El-Galaly TC, Villa D, Gormsen LC, Baech J, Lo A, Cheah CY. 2018. FDG-PET / CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions. J Int Med 284: 358 – 376.
Fahey FH, Bom, HH-S, Chiti A, Choi YY, Huang G, Lassmann M, Laurin N, Mut F, Nuñez-Miller R, O’ Keeffe D, Pradhan P, Scott AM, Song S, Soni N, Uchiyama M, Vargas L. 2016. Standardization of Administered Activities in Pediatric Nuclear Medicine: A Report of the First Nuclear Medicine Global Initiative Project, Part 2— Current Standards and the Path Toward Global Standardization. J Nucl Med 57: 1148 – 1157.
Grimes J, Celler A. 2014. Comparison of internal dose estimates obtained using organ-level, voxel S value, and Monte Carlo techniques. Med Phys 41. https:// doi. org / 10.1118 / 1.4892606 Halid B, Karim, MKA, Sabarudin A, Bakar KA, Shariff ND. 2018. Assessment of lifetime attributable risk of stomach and colon cancer during abdominal CT examinations based on Monte Carlo simulation. IFMBE Proc 63: 455 – 459.
Halpern BS, Dahlbom M, Quon A, Schiepers C, Waldherr C, Silverman DH, Ratib O, Czernin J. 2004. Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET / CT image quality and lesion detectability. J Nucl Med 45.
Harrison JD, Balonov M, Martin CJ, Ortiz Lopez P, Menzel H-G, Simmonds JR, Smith-Bindman R, Wakeford R. 2016. Use of effective dose. Ann ICRP 45( 1): 215 – 224.
Harun HH, Karim MKA, Abbas Z, Rahman MAA, Sabarudin A, Ng KH. 2020. Association of radiation doses and cancer risks from CT pulmonary angiography examinations in relation to body diameter. Diagnostics 10( 9). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / diagnos tics10090681
Huang B, Law MW-M, Khong P-L. 2009. Whole-body PET / CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251: 166 – 174.
Huda W, He W. 2012. Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 150: 168 – 179.
Huda W, Schoepf UJ, Abro JA, Mah E, Costello P. 2011. Radiationrelated cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT. Am J Roentgenol 196: 159 – 165.
ICRP. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103, Ann ICRP 37( 2 – 4).
ICRP. 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 106, Ann ICRP 38( 1-2): 1 – 197.
ICRP. 2015. ICRP Publication 128: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: A Compendium of current information related to frequently used substances. Ann ICRP 44, 7 – 321.
ICRP. 2021. Use of dose quantities in radiological protection. ICRP Publication 147 Ann ICRP 50: 9 – 82.
ICRP. 2022. Radiation detriment calculation methodology. ICRP Publication 152, Ann ICR 51( 3).
Karim MKA, Hashim S, Bakar KA, Bradley DA, Ang WC, Bahrudin NA, Mhareb MHA. 2017. Estimation of radiation cancer risk in CT-KUB. Radiat Phys Chem 137: 130 – 134.
Karim MKA, Hashim S, Sabarudin A, Bradley D, Bahruddin N. 2016. Evaluating organ dose and radiation risk of routine CTexaminations in Johor Malaysia. UKM Journal Article 45( 4): 567 – 573.
Kessara A, Buyukcizmeci N, Gedik GK. 2023. Estimation of patient organ and whole-body doses in [ 18F-FDG ] PET / CT SCAN. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 199( 1): 61 – 68.
Khamwan K, Krisanachinda A, Pasawang P. 2010. The determination of patient dose from( 18) F-FDG PET / CT examination. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 141( 1): 50 – 55.
Koopman D, van Osch, JA. C., Jager PL, Tenbergen, CJ. A., Knollema S, Slump CH, van Dalen, JA. 2016. How to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines. EJNMMI Phys 3: 22.
Kwon HW, Kim JP, Lee HJ, Paeng JC, Lee JS, Cheon GJ, Lee DS, Chung J-K., Kang KW. 2016. Radiation dose from whole-body F- 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography: nationwide survey in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 31( Suppl 1): S69.
Li Y, Jiang L, Wang H, Cai H, Xiang Y, Li L. 2019. Effective radiation dose of 18F-FDG PET / CT: How much does diagnostic CT contribute. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 187: 183 – 190.
Lim H, Choi J, Kim J-H., Cheong H-K., Ha M. 2018. Estimation of cancer incidence and mortality risks attributed to diagnostic medical radiation exposure in Korea, 2013. J Korean Med Sci 33( 29). https:// doi. org / 10.3346 / jkms. 2018.33. e211
Masoomi M, Al-Shammeri I, Al-Kandari L, Elrahman H, Alshammari, JM. 2020. Establishment of National DRL for CT in Hybrid Imaging Studies( The Second Phase of the National NM CT( PET) Dose Audit for Kuwait Population �2019). MedRxiv. https:// doi. org / 10.1101 / 2020.09.20.20198176
Masoomi M, Al-Shammeri I, Al-Kandari L, Elrahman H, Al- Shammeri J. 2021. National Diagnostic Reference Level( DRL) for nuclear medicine computed tomography-positron emission tomography hybrid imaging studies for Kuwait population: second phase dose audit-2019. BJR | Open 3( 1): 20210020. https:// doi. org / 10.1259 / bjro. 20210020
National Research Council. 2006. BEIR VII Phase II: Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. National Academies Press. https:// doi. org / 10.17226 / 11340
Murat H, Awang Kechik MM, Chew MT, Kamal I, Abdul Karim MK. 2024. Bibliometric review of optimization and image processing of positron emission tomography( PET) imaging system between 1981 – 2022. Curr Med Imag 20. https:// doi. org / 10.2174 / 0115734056282004240403042345
Murat H, Karim M, Kechik M, Amer M, Razak H, Kamal I, Chew M. 2023. Internal dose assessment of lymphoma 18 F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography( PET) scan. J Phys: Conf Ser 2623: 012003. https:// doi. org / 10.1088 / 1742-6596 / 2623 / 1 / 012003
Quinn BT, Dauer Z, Pandit-Taskar N, Schöder H, Dauer, LT( 2016). Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET / CT: incorporating examspecific parameters in dose estimates. BMC Med Imag. https:// doi. org / 10.1186 / S12880-016-0143-Y