Z. You et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 1), 20 – 27 27
Jia Q, Chen Z, Jiang X, Zhao Z, Huang M, Li J, Zhuang J, Liu X, Hu T, Liang W. 2017. Operator radiation and the efficacy of ceilingsuspended lead screen shielding during coronary angiography: an anthropomorphic phantom study using real-time dosimeters. Sci Rep 7: 42077.
Liu F, Raja, You Z, Wang J, Li W, Wu Y, Suthakorn W, Liao L. 2023. Effect of new radioprotective equipment on reducing radiation exposure of participants in percutaneous coronary intervention. Radioprotection 58: 91 – 98.
Liu F, Wang J, Liu X, Huang Y, Deng Q, Ou Y, Liao L. 2018. Effect of optimizing nursing process on reducing radiation exposure of interventional nurses during emergency coronary stenting. Chin J Radiat Med Protect 38: 617 – 620.
Lee Y, Lee WJ, Jin YW, Jang S. 2021. Interventional radiologists have a higher rate of chromosomal damage due to occupational radiation exposure: a dicentric chromosome assay. Eur Radiol 31: 8256 – 8263.
MaW, MaH, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang H, Wang S, Wang Q, WangL, Fang K, Bai J, Bai X, Feng J, Ning X, Ren X, Liu G, An Y, Su X, Li X, Li P, Zhang X. Zhang D, Chen L, Zhao M, Hu Z, Hu S, Gao Y, Rao C, Guo Q, Wen N, Xie Y, Zhai M, Xue Y, Yin C, Yang N, Shi Y. 2021. Summary of the China Cardiovascular Disease Healthcare Quality Report 2021. Chinese Journal of Circulation. 36( 11): 1041-1064. Monzen H, Tamura M, Shimomura K, Onishi Y, Nakayama S,
Fujimoto T, Matsumoto K, Hanaoka K, Kamomae T. 2017. A
novel radiation protection device based on tungsten functional paper for application in interventional radiology. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18: 215 – 220.
Papp C, Romano-Miller M, Descalzo A, Michelin S, Molinari A, Rossini A, Plotkin C, Bodino G, Esperanza G, Di Giorgio M, Touzet R. 2017. Results of relid study 2014-Buenos Aires, Argentina retrospective evaluation of lens injuries and dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 173: 212 – 217.
Rajaraman P, Doody MM, Yu CL, Preston DL, Miller JS, Sigurdson AJ, Freedman DM, Alexander BH, Little MP, Miller DL, Linet MS. 2016. Cancer risks in U. S. radiologic technologists working with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994-2008. Am J Roentgenol 206( 5).
Uwineza A, Kalligeraki AA, Hamada N, Jarrin M, Quinlan RA. 2019. Cataractogenic load � a concept to study the contribution of ionizing radiation to accelerated aging in the eye lens. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 779: 68 – 81.
Ullery BW, Landau B, Wang GJ, Faifrman RM, Woo EY. 2014. Radiation dose to the interventionalist is directly affected by the operating position. Vascular 22: 149 – 153.
Zhao R, Wu J, Yu J, Liao Z, Zhou Z, Yang Y. 2017. Study on the inverse square law of X-ray radiation field. Nucl Sci Eng 37: 482 – 486. Zhang L, Zhu J, Min N, Lu F, Chen Y. 2011. Estimation of effective dose to radiation workers in 3 common interventions. Chin J Radiat Med Protect 31: 391 – 394.
Cite this article as: You Z, Liu Y, Li C, Hu A, Liu X, Li W, Liao L, Liu F. 2025. Analysis and consideration of radiation dose distribution in cardiac catheterization interventions. Radioprotection 60( 1): 20 – 27. https:// doi. org / 10.1051 / radiopro / 2024037
Please help to maintain this journal in open access!
This journal is currently published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model( S2O). We are thankful to our subscribers and supporters for making it possible to publish this journal in open access in the current year, free of charge for authors and readers.
Check with your library that it subscribes to the journal, or consider making a personal donation to the S2O programme by contacting subscribers @ edpsciences. org.
More information, including a list of supporters and financial transparency reports, is available at https:// edpsciences. org / en / subscribe-to-open-s2o.