A. Zabirova et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 1), 99 – 108 107 Clement C, et al. 2022. Maintenir les recommandations de la CIPR adaptées aux besoins. Radioprotection 57: 93 – 106.
Clement C, et al. 2021. Keeping the ICRP recommendations fit for purpose. J Radiol Prot 41: 1390 – 1409.
Croüail P. et al. 2020. Analysis of the modalities of return of populations to the contaminated territories following the accident at the Fukushima power plant. Radioprotection 55: 79 – 93.
Do X. 2020. Return Migration after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: the impact of institutional and individual factors. Disasters 44( 3): 569 – 595.
Facility construction begins for Japan’ s Fukushima nuclear wastewater release amid opposition. Available online: https:// english. news. cn / 20220805 / e5c88eb3134f4786b3070af31f364b48 / c. html
Fukushima Prefectural Government. Result of sea area monitoring associated with the discharge of ALPS treated water into the sea 2023 November 14 – 16. Available online: https:// www. pref. fukushima. lg. jp / site / portal-english / en-moni-k. html
Gagné I. 2020. Dislocation, social isolation, and the politics of recovery in post-disaster Japan. Transcult Psychiatry 57( 5): 710 – 723.
Hande V. et al., 2023. Changes in the intention to return and the related risk perception among residents and evacuees of Tomioka town 11 years after the Fukushima nuclear accident. J Disaster Med Public Health 17: e386.
Huaxia( 2022). Facility construction begins for Japan ' s Fukushima nuclear wastewater release amid opposition( Xinhua net)
IAEA. 2015. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Report by the Director General. Available online: https:// www-pub. iaea. org / MTCD / Publications / PDF / Pub1710-ReportByTheDG-Web. pdf IAEA. 2022. Review of Safety Related Aspects of Handling ALPS Treated Water at TEPCO’ s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Report 4: Review Mission to TEPCO and METI. Available online: https:// www. iaea. org / sites / default / files / report-4-reviewmission-tepco-and-meti. pdf
IAEA. 2023. Comprehensive report on the safety review of the ALPS treated water at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Available online: https:// www. iaea. org / sites / default / files / iaea _ comprehensive _ alps _ report. pdf
ICRP Publication 146. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident, Ann. Maeda Y. et al., 2002. Determinants of trust in industry, government, and citizen’ s groups in Japan. Risk Anal 23( 2): 303 – 310.
Matsumoto M. 2018. Formation of third place by evacuees from nuclear accident: case study of wide area residents’ association of Tomioka town, Futaba County, Fukushima Prefecture. J Disaster Res 13( 6): 1142 – 1156.
Matsunaga H. et al., 2021. Intention to return in residents of Okuma and its characteristics: the evacuation order was lifted eight years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. J Radiat Res. 62: 68 – 70.
Murakami M. et al., 2019. Lower psychological distress levels among returnees compared with evacuees after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Tohoku J Exp Med 247: 13 – 17.
NEA. 2020. Making the most of practical experiences gained during past crises or disasters for improving mental health and psychosocial support in radiation emergencies. Available online: https:// www. oecd-nea. org / upload / docs / application / pdf / 2020-09 / egnr _ web _ events _- _ flyer _ final. pdf
Onyx J, et al. 2000. Measuring social capital in five communities, J Appl Behav Sci 36: 23 – 42.
Panchenko S. 2001. Chernobyl in three dimensions. Addressing the Rehabilitation and Secondary Medical Consequences of the Chernobyl Disaster European Commission. Available online: http:// en. ibrae. ac. ru / russian / chernobyl-3d / society / III _ 3 _ 6. htm( Translated from Russian by DeepL).
Saito M. et al. 2017. Development of an instrument for communitylevel health related social capital among Japanese older people: the JAGES Project. J Epidemiol 27: 221 – 227.
Shimizu N. 2022. Nuclear disaster and gender: invisible women’ s experiences of the disaster and their support needs. Academic Trends 27( 4): 441 – 445.( Translated from Japanese by DeepL).
Staněk R. et al., 2021. Social capital and mobility: an experimental study. MUNI ECON Working Paper. Available online: https:// doi. org / 10.5817 / WP _ MUNI _ ECON _ 2021-12
Sung O et al. 2022. Radiation risk perception and its associated factors among residents living near nuclear power plants: a nationwide survey in Korea, Nucl Eng Technol 54( 4): 1295 – 300.
Takamura N et al., 2021. Experiences of crisis communication during radiation emergency and risk communication for recovery of the community in Fukushima. J Radiat Res 62: 95 – 100.
Thu Zar W et al. 2023. An analysis of the desire to make radiation measurements and to dialogue with experts among the residents of Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture: about the implementation of the co-expertise process. Radioprotection 58: 79 – 89
Tokuda Y et al. 2009. Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory. Value Health 12: 568 – 573. Tomioka Town. What we do at Tomioka Town Food Inspection Center”. Available online: https:// tomioka-radiation. jp / shokuhin kensajo. html
Uchida Y et al. 2015. Changes in consumer behavior regarding local food products after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: a case study of Fukushima City. Agric Human Values 32( 3): 495 – 504.
Uekusa S et al., 2022. Conceptualizing disaster social capital: what it is, why it matters, and how it can be enhanced. Disasters 46: 56 – 79.
UNSCEAR. 2022. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, Vol I. Available online: https:// www. unscear. org / unscear / uploads / docu ments / unscear-reports / UNSCEAR _ 2020 _ 21 _ Report _ Vol. I. pdf
Villalonga-Olives E et al., 2017. The dark side of social capital: a systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital, Soc Sci Med 194: 105 – 127.
Yamaguchi A et al., 2017. Influences of social capital on natural disaster research in Japan. J Sustain Dev 10: 46 – 54.
Yamakawa M, et al. 2017. Rebuilding Fukushima, 1st ed. Routledge: Abingdon, New York, pp 43 – 47.
Cite this article as: Zabirova A, Matsunaga H, Orita M, Kashiwazaki Y, Xiao X, Schneider T, Takamura N. 2025. Impact of the discharge of treated water on residents’ intention to return to areas near the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station a decade after the accident. Radioprotection 60 1: https:// doi. org / 10.1051 / radiopro / 2024036