Radioprotection No 59-4 | Seite 93

332 J-M Deniel : Radioprotection 2024 , 59 ( 4 ), 327 – 337
Table 3 . Picture definition effects on the sum of form factors and the irradiance estimation . Only p pixels corresponding to incandescent materials are considered here .
Definition
Difference with 4,6403,472 px
Width px
Height px
P p ff p sr
E IR
W / m 2
D P p ff p
D E IR
4,640
3,472
0.049252
1,797
2,320
1,736
0.048445
1,753
�64 %
�2.45 %
1,160
868
0.047411
1,651
�3.74 %
�8.12 %
580
434
0.046856
1,614
�4.87 %
�10.18 %
290
271
0.046552
1,556
�5.48 %
�13.41 %
145
109
0.046557
1,587
�5.47 %
�11.69 %
73
55
0.047112
1,617
�4.35 %
�10.02 %
Fig . 6 . Top : pictures of our metal furnace with black line silhouettes in the highest and lowest resolutions tested in this paper . Bottom : estimated temperatures at various image resolution , in false colors .
We explored definition effects on exposure assessment through E IR difference and the sum of relevant pixel form factors sum in the picture of the 1,000 ° C furnace . We reduced picture definition from 4640347px down to 7355 px by powers of two using Gimp 2.10 software ( Spencer Kimball , Peter Mattis , 2021 and The Gnome Project , 2021 ) and bicubic interpolation ( Rowe , 2018 ).
The results are compared to those of the original picture in Table 3 . The difference in evolution between the sum of the form factors and irradiance seems mainly due to pixel color interpolation influencing T temperature and m material estimation .
3.4 Combined effect of picture definition and item silhouette on irradiance estimation
We studied definition effects on the irradiance estimation , in the case where incandescent objects are not massive areas of pixels in the picture . This may be the case of forged pieces for example . Again , we used the 4,6403,472px picture of our metal furnace at 1,000 ° C . Black lines were added to this picture to make its silhouette stand out more clearly , as illustrated in Figure 6 . In this figure , we show the method result in terms of temperature estimation at various image resolution .
Table 4 should be read like Table 3 , for the combined effects of silhouette and resolution . In both tables , a decrease in E IR and Sff p is observed ( R 2 ( Sff p ; E IR )= 0.82 ): as shown in Figure 6 , lower resolution images show dark areas compared to full resolution . Color of pixels in a lower resolution image comes from mixing that of a higher resolution image . Then , ( g p / r p ; b p / r p ) hue of these p pixels may not match any ( m p ; T p ) material and temperature in the hue-to-temperature and material precomputed matrix ( Deniel , 2024 ). In this case , these p pixels are ignored in the E IR evaluation . In other case , ( g p / r p ; b p / r p ) may correspond to ( m p ; T p ) different from the full