46 S . Semghouli et al .: Radioprotection 2024 , 59 ( 1 ), 42 – 49
Table 5 . Benchmarking of the established Moroccan DRL in terms of DLP ( mGy . cm ) with international values .
Study |
Year |
DRL |
D Morocco-Country |
Saudi Arabia ( Al-Othman et al ., 2022 ) |
2022 |
886 |
�112.8 |
Lebanon Switzerland ( Karout et al ., 2022 ) |
2022 |
967 |
�193.8 |
Australia ( Lee et al ., 2020 ) |
2020 |
600 |
173.2 |
UK ( Shrimpton et al ., 2003 .) |
2003 |
745 |
28.2 |
Greece ( Simantirakis et al ., 2015 ) |
2015 |
758 |
15.2 |
Japan ( Kanda et al ., 2021 ) |
2020 |
1000 |
�226.8 |
Germany ( Appel et al ., 2018 ) |
2018 |
700 |
73.2 |
USA ( Kanal et al ., 2017 ) |
2017 |
775 |
�1.8 |
France ( Roch et al ., 2018 ) |
2018 |
650 |
123.2 |
Syria ( Kharita and Khazzam , 2010 ) |
2009 |
721 |
52.2 |
Turkey ( Atac et al ., 2015 ) |
2015 |
204 |
569.2 |
Italy ( Compagnone et al ., 2021 ) |
2021 |
555 |
218.2 |
Ireland ( Foley et al ., 2012 ) |
2012 |
600 |
173.2 |
Canada ( Wardlaw , 2018 ) |
2017 |
806 |
�32.8 |
Nigeria ( Ekpo et al ., 2018 ) |
2017 |
1486 |
�712.8 |
Kenya ( Korir et al ., 2016 ) |
2016 |
1842 |
�1068.8 |
India ( Saravanakumar et al ., 2014 ) |
2014 |
482 |
291.2 |
Portugal ( Santos et al ., 2014 ) |
2014 |
800 |
�26.8 |
Egypt ( Salama et al ., 2017 ) |
2016 |
1325 |
�551.8 |
in the five Moroccan university hospitals . The 75th percentile for abdomino-pelvic CT was lowest at UHC-1 and highest at UHC-2 . Interestingly , the university hospital had a significant impact on the 75th percentile of DLP . Differences in CT technology , scanning protocols and professionals ’ knowledge and practice of patient radiation protection contribute greatly to these variations ( Amaoui et al ., 2023 ; Ekpo et al ., 2018 ). On the other hand , tube current has a direct linear effect on radiation dose ( i . e . 50 % reduction in tube current results in 50 % reduction in associated dose ) and this may be the reason for the highest dose noted at UHC-2 among the five centers mentioned in this study ( Lira et al ., 2015 ). In addition , exposure parameters in terms of slice thickness and pitch differ considerably from one hospital to another , which may also explain the different results of CTDI , DLP and ED .
This study provides these DRLs are proposed as NDRLs for abdominopelvic CT examination in Morocco . All data included in this analysis were obtained using a multi-slice spiral CT scanner with an average tube potential of 120 kVp . The CT systems included in the current study differ in terms of technology and model , with the number of slices per rotation ranging from 16 to 64 . The DRL results for the centers studied were comparable , with the exception of the DRL noted at UHC-2 , which was very high . The results show large dose variations between UHC-2 and the other centers ( Tab . 4 ). Variations in CTDI vol and DLP for CT examinations between centers may be influenced by population characteristics , practice , technology , as well as examination protocol .
The proposed local DRLs for the five university hospitals in terms of DLP were between 551.56 mGy-cm ( UHC-1 ) and 2293.33 mGy-cm ( UHC-2 ) and 9.88 mGy ( UHC-5 ) and 46.40 mGy ( UHC-2 ) for CTDIvol ( Tab . 4 ). By comparing these results with those obtained in similar studies by El Fahssi et al .,
( in press ) who reported 444.51 mGy for DLP and 8.14 mGy for CTDIvol and by Benamar et al ., ( 2023 ) who found 517.1 mGy . cm for DLP and 11.3 mGy for CTDIvol , our findings showed a higher value for DLP and CTDIvol .
Table 5 summarizes a benchmarking between the DRL results obtained by this study and other DRLs established by various studies around the world . Comparing the NDRL≈773mGy established for the abdomino-pelvic procedure with that of other countries , Morocco demonstrated a dose significantly almost four times higher than that of Turkey ( 204 mGy ) and almost two and a half times smaller than that of Kenya ( 1842 mGy ). Lebanon , Japan , Kenya , Nigeria and Egypt showed an abdomen-pelvis CT dose 25 %, 29 %, 138 %, 92 % and 71 % higher than Morocco respectively ( Ekpo et al ., 2018 ). Whereas Italy , India and Turkey recorded an abdomenpelvis CT dose 55 %, 61 % and 279 % lower respectively than Morocco . However , this value remains comparable to those reported by the rest of the countries . A graphic illustration in Figure 1 clearly highlights this comparative approach . This further confirms the need to develop protocols and procedures as well as optimize CT examination practices in Morocco . The significant variations in dose within the same university hospital and between university hospitals in Morocco could be due to differences in CT machines technical platforms , the protocols and procedures used , the training levels of radiology technicians in terms of optimizing procedures and , above all , the non-assignment of medical physicists in radiology departments to date in Morocco .
During this investigation , we have analyzed data relating to abdominopelvic CT scan procedures from all UHCs in Morocco . Indeed , the Moroccan Agency for Nuclear and Radiological Safety and Security ( AMSSNuR ) is responsible for the regulation and control of activities involving sources of