352 W. Thu Zar et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 4), 344 – 353
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.
Author contribution statement
Win Thu Zar: Conceptualization, literature review, qualitative and quantitative analysis, drafting; Varsha Hande: drafting and qualitative analysis; Makiko Orita; Hitomi Matzunanga; Jacques Lochard; Thierry Schneider and Noboru Takamura: advice and internal reviewing.
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was not required. Informed consent
Informed consent was not required.
References
Ando R, Lochard J, Schneider T, Akimoto N, Sasaki D, Iseki, K. 2024. Young generations facing post-nuclear accident situations: from Chernobyl to Fukushima. Radioprotection 59: 261 – 269.
Ando R. 2021. How to overcome the difficulty of talking about the experienceof a nuclear disaster. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recovery after Nuclear Accidents: Radiological Protection Lessons from Fukushima and Beyond. Ann. ICRP 50: 2021.
Brooks AL, Glines WM, Waltar A. 2020. Lessons learned in communication from the Fukushima accident. Proceedings of the Joint American Nuclear Society and Health Physics Society Conference: Applicability of Radiation-Response Models to Low- Dose Protection Standards 1 – 3 October 2018, Pasco, Washington. Health Phys 118: 297 – 298.
Canet L, Takada M, Yasutaka T. 2024. Comparative qualitative and quantitative analysis of guidelines for nuclear accident recovery. Radioprotection 59: 69 – 79.
FHMS. 2018. Agenda of 25th reviewing board meeting of Fukushima Health Management Survey( in Japanese). Available from: https:// www. pref. fukushima. lg. jp / site / portal / kenkocyosa-kentoiinkai-25. html( 9 September 2018, date last accessed).
Fukushima Prefecture. 2011. 環境放射能測定結果に関するお知ら せ( Information on Environmental Radiation Measurement Results) [ in Japanese ]. Retrieved from https:// www. pref. fukush ima. lg. jp / sec _ file / monitoring / etc / post2-20120921. pdf
Fukushima Prefecture. 2012. 45th Prefectural Health Survey Review Committee Report. Available at: https:// www. pref. fukushima. lg. jp / sec / 21045b / kenkocyosa-kentoiinkai-45. html. Accessed on( 18 March 2025, date last accessed).
Fukushima Prefecture. 2023. Environmental Radiation Monitoring Results in Fukushima. Fukushima Prefecture Official Report. Available at: https:// www. pref. fukushima. lg. jp.
Great East Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Disaster Memorial Museum.( 2024). Official website. Fukushima Prefecture. Retrieved( 18 March 18, 2025) from https:// www. fipo. or. jp / lore / en.
Governmental Report. 2012. In Fukushima Mirai [ Internet ]. Retrieved from https:// fukushima-mirai. env. go. jp / cop27 / en / com munity / futaba /.
Igarashi Y. 2022. The Round-Table project in Kashiwa: a dialogue to reconcile consumers and farmers in the Tokyo suburbs after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 57: 209 – 215.
ICRP. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Ann ICRP 49.
Ito S, Goto A. 2024. Attitudes toward future child-rearing among male and female adults without children in different prefectures at 11 years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Radioprotection 59: 211 – 219.
Ito S, Okabe S, Goto A. 2023. Attitudes toward future motherhood among female college students in Fukushima Prefecture at seven years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Radioprotection 58: 271 – 279.
Kobayashi T, Takebayashi Y, Murakami M. 2020. Disaster-zone research: participants should benefit too. Nature 579: 193.
Lochard J, et al. 2020. The post-nuclear accident co-expertise experience of the Suetsugi community in Fukushima Prefecture. Radioprotection 55: 225 – 235.
Murakami M, Sato A, Matsui S, et al., 2017. Communicating with residents about risks following the Fukushima nuclear accident. Asia-Pac J Public He 2017; 29( 2 _ suppl): 74s – 89s.
NPO Fukushima Dialogue 2023. The records of the 25th Fukushima Dialogue( Videos and PPTs). Available at: https:// fukushimadialogue. jp / en /.
Namie Town 2025. About Ukedo Elementary School Museum. Accessed March 5, 2025. Available at: https:// namie-ukedo. com / en / about /.
Orita M, et al. 2015. Bipolarization of risk perception about the health effects of radiation in residents after the accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. PLoS One 10: e0129227.
Pallant J. 2013. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. United Kingdom: McGraw Hill.
Schneider T, Lochard J. 2021. Supporting societal and economic dynamics of recovery: lessons from Chernobyl and Fukushima. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recovery after Nuclear Accidents: Radiological Protection Lessons from Fukushima and Beyond. Ann. ICRP 50: 68 – 73.
Takamura N et al. 2018. Recovery from nuclear disaster in Fukushima: collaboration model. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 182: 49 – 52.
Thu Zar W, Lochard J, Taira Y, Takamura N, Orita M, Matsunaga H. 2022. Risk communication in the recovery phase after a nuclear accident: the contribution of the“ co-expertise process”. Radioprotection 57: 281 – 288.
Thu Zar W, Matsunaga H, Xiao X, Lochard J, Orita M, Takamura N. 2023. An analysis of the desire to make radiation measurements and to dialogue with experts among the residents of Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture: about the implementation of the coexpertise process. Radioprotection 58: 79 – 89.
UNSCEAR2013Report, Volume II, Scientific Annex A: Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure due to the Nuclear Accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. United Nations, New York.
WordClouds. com.( 2025). Create word clouds. Retrieved March 5, 2025, from https:// www. wordclouds. com /.