M. Murakami et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 4), 337 – 343 343 Murakami M, Takebayashi Y, Ono K, Kubota A, Tsubokura M. 2020 The decision to return home and wellbeing after the Fukushima disaster. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 47: 101538.
Ochi S. 2021.’ Life communication’ after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster: what experts need to learn from residential nonscientific rationality. J Radiat Res 62: I88 – I94.
Sawano T, Ozaki A, Hori A, Tsubokura M. 2019. Combating‘ fake news’ and social stigma after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant incident-the importance of accurate longitudinal clinical data. QJM-Int J Med 112: 479 – 481.
Schneider T, Lochard J. 2024. Social sciences and humanities in the management of the recovery process after the Fukushima accident � summary of the May 25, 2024 on-line meeting. CEPN-R333, September 2024.
Schneider T, Lochard J, Maître M, Ban N, Croüail P, Gallego E, Homma T, Kai M, Lecomte JF, Takamura N. 2021. Radiological protection challenges facing business activities affected by a nuclear accident: some lessons from the management of the accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Radioprotection 56: 181 – 192.
Schneider T, Maître M, Lochard J, Charron S, Lecomte J-F., Ando R, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, Kuroda Y, Miyazaki M, Naito W, Orita M, Takamura N, Tanigawa K, Tsubokura M, Yasutaka T. 2019. The role of radiological protection experts in stakeholder involvement
in the recovery phase of post-nuclear accident situations: some lessons from the Fukushima-Daïchi NPP accident. Radioprotection 54: 259 – 270.
Takada M, Murakami M, Ohnuma S, Shibata Y, Yasutaka T. 2025. Public perception and underlying values regarding final disposal of radioactively contaminated soil from a large nuclear accident. Environ Manage https:// doi. org / 10.1007 / s00267-00025- 02124-00262.
Takamura N, Orita M, Taira Y, Fukushima Y, Yamashita S. 2018. Recovery from nuclear disaster in Fukushima: collaboration model. Radiat Prot Dosim 182: 49 – 52.
Tsujikawa N, Tsuchida S, Shiotani T. 2016. Changes in the factors influencing public acceptance of nuclear power generation in Japan since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Risk Anal 36: 98 – 113.
Yasutaka T, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, Kobayashi T, Kondoh A, Takahashi T, Kuroda Y. 2020. Dialogue, radiation measurements and other collaborative practices by experts and residents in the former evacuation areas of Fukushima: a case study in Yamakiya District, Kawamata Town. Radioprotection 55: 215 – 224.
Yokoyama M, Ohnuma S, Hirose Y. 2021. Can the veil of ignorance create consensus?: A qualitative analysis using the siting for a contaminated waste landfill game. Lect Notes Comput Sci 11988: 139 – 152.
Cite this article as: Murakami M, Schneider T, Lochard J, Ando R. 2025. Report on the first Osaka workshop on social sciences and humanities in the management of the recovery process after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 60( 4): 337 – 343. https:// doi. org / 10.1051 / radiopro / 2025024
Please help to maintain this journal in open access!
This journal is currently published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model( S2O). We are thankful to our subscribers and supporters for making it possible to publish this journal in open access in the current year, free of charge for authors and readers.
Check with your library that it subscribes to the journal, or consider making a personal donation to the S2O programme by contacting subscribers @ edpsciences. org.
More information, including a list of supporters and financial transparency reports, is available at https:// edpsciences. org / en / subscribe-to-open-s2o.