272 A. Khallouqi et al.: Radioprotection 2025, 60( 3), 268 – 276
Fig. 5. The distribution of D w( indicated by the dashed line) and D eff( shown by the dotted line).
Fig. 6. Relationship between FD and FLA based on patient gender, with distinct markers for each gender.
Figure 6 illustrates the relationship between F D and F LA, derived from 96 male and 104 female examinations. Distinct marker shapes were employed to differentiate between genders. The corresponding fit coefficients are presented in Table 2.
Figure 7 shows the relationship between D eff, D W, and d LAT. In this graph, both D eff and D w are plotted as a function of d LAT, revealing high positive correlations. Coefficients of
Table 2. Correlation coefficients, slope, and intercept between F D and F LA.
|
|
R |
a |
b |
F D � F LA |
Women |
0.82 |
0.49 |
0.97 |
F D � F LA |
Men |
0.96 |
0.71 |
0.94 |