Quarry Southern Africa September 2018 | Page 23

TECHNOLOGY “Traditional blasting would break rock into chunks often too big to go on the conveyor into the crusher, resulting in massive waste.” operations team control of the process. Client research has revealed that drilling and blasting accounts for 30% to 40% of operational costs. “The solution requires a five-step approach to achieving the operational data output: Pre-blast safety inspection is a primary safety element. The assessment of the blast radius and aerial view of the sequence of the explosives allows the blast and drilling engineer to rectify any error before the blast. Live video feed of the actual blast in high resolution for analysis is available in slow motion. This allows for detailed visual analysis and accountability of the blast. Post blast safety inspection is conducted to confirm that the process was executed according to the plan and the area is clear to resume work. Fragmentation analysis is provided of the muck pile, which allows for better planning. Reports on the fragmentation are provided on an ongoing basis to ensure consistency and historical trend analysis,” says Mnisi. least be warned that a misfire occurred during the blast and therefore prompt the team to take extra precaution during loading,” says Tose. Technology has changed drill-and-blast Drone data solutions company Rocketmine effectively uses drone technology in the mining sector. Nomthi Mnisi, Rocketmine marketing, communications and training manager, says: “The Rocketmine blast monitoring and fragmentation analysis solution removes operational pains for mines, and shifts the focus to improving efficiency. Enhancing efficiencies and maximising outputs entail lowering operating costs and providing real-time visual access of the blasts to allow the Artificial intelligence BME technical director, Tony Rorke, says: “Much of the technological advance in blasting has been based on the evolution of electronic delay detonators (EDDs) and that these devices allow such flexible and reliable detonation sequences. This is being further enhanced by our ability to capture, store, and analyse large amounts of data from each blast — opening the door for artificial intelligence tools to start predicting results and proposing alternative designs.” An indication of the pace of technological advance is that the blasting software and related systems are increasingly user-friendly, and the powerful results attainable are becoming almost expected at site level. Among the benefits of applying EDDs are controlling vibration, reducing the blast damage to the pit wall, and preventing blasted material from being thrown onto ramp roadways. “A key reason that makes these results so predictable and repeatable is that the use of EDDs removes the old problem in traditional blasting of signal lines being cut during the blast and stopping certain holes from detonating,” he says. “This was always the risk if the blaster wanted to extend the duration of a blast sequence for better results; instead, today’s digital detonators function independently once the ‘fire’ command has been given.” This means that all the detonators in a blast begin their respective countdowns simultaneously at the point of initiation — and so will continue to progress normally towards their firing times even if the signal lines are cut by rock movements — usually resulting from earlier explosions in the sequence. The digital nature of the EDD technology, Rorke says, allows a vast amount of data about the activity parameters of each detonator to be recorded and stored. “We will soon be able to upload all this data into a centralised database, linked to our XPLOLOG™ system, which allows on-site personnel on a blast block to enter key parameters electronically using a rugged mobile handheld device,” he says. “While the user can upload their survey and blast designs to the central XPLOLOG™ database, the data can also be downloaded onto mobile devices for instant management reporting.” He emphasised that big data is vital for the analysis of trends and to be able to recognise what blasters should be doing to improve blasting results; it is therefore becoming an important contributor to advancing efficiency levels in mining. “We are now also exploring the power of artificial intelligence to help us predict the results of any particular blast design,” he says. “Using the historical results of hundreds if not thousands of previous blasts, these systems could deploy sophisticated algorithms to predict blast outcomes in terms of movement, fragmentation, back damage and throw, for instance.” Neither are these options and possibilities just theoretical; he highlighted QUARRY SA | SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 _ 21