Quarry Southern Africa September 2017 | Page 42

MONEY TIGHT?
Web / Brand listings

MONEY TIGHT?

Plant Equipment & Hire is South Africa’ s original earthmoving equipment magazine. Supplying business people in the built environment with information, specifications and trends in equipment, vehicles and related services.
... MAKE THE MOST OF EVERY CENT WITH A BRAND LISTING Includes print & web benefits | Call + 27( 0) 11 579 4940 www. interactmedia. co. za + 27 11 579 4940 joanne @ interactmedia. co. za
INSIGHT

Beware online inductions

By Nico Pienaar
Swapping face-to-face induction for online recorded induction may seem like a perfectly safe, costeffective, and time saving way to ensure safety on quarries and mines, but this practice may leave the door open for system failures and may even expose companies to the risk of liability in the event of an incident.

In the event of recorded online inductions, the recordings can often become proof of system failures or non-compliances, particularly where inductions are not kept up to date with changing legislation or the changing nature of the operation. For example, the introduction of certain mechanised equipment may require additional information to be covered in the induction.

If an incident occurs and the investigation shows that the induction did not cover part or all of the environmental, health, or safety information as required by legislation, then the very record of induction that was meant to protect the operation can become the single-most damning piece of evidence to prosecute an operation. It is therefore critical to ensure inductions are completed in line with the latest legislation per the operations risk assessment. Any changes need to be timeously adopted and reflected in the induction.
In the interest of real safety, face-to-face inductions are often preferable, as they allow the inductees to question points and gain a real understanding of the unique requirements of a particular site. The person presenting the induction can also draw special attention to certain risks on site and test an inductee’ s understanding if, for any reason, they suspect the person may not fully understand certain requirements.
Although a video portrays images and information about an event, it is not quite the same as being there, which makes it preferable for the person to be present and on site when the induction is being done. This also allows an element of dynamic intervention that can be easily adapted according to prevailing conditions, such as warning a visitor of the risk of slipping and falling, which may be increased by rainfall or dust suppression in the event of dry, windy conditions.
Online or distant inductions do not allow this type of common sense to prevail, and even in the event of the induction being completely up to date and comprehensive, it is still doubtful that it could ever be as effective as a face-to-face induction or, better still, a combination of both. In the interest of true safety, and not just for the sake of legal compliance, we recommend that quarries and mines pay careful attention to induction and always maintain a good level of human interface to supplement any remote or online induction. n
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Nico Pienaar is the director of surface mining association Aspasa.
Aspasa
Nico Pienaar, director of surface mining association Aspasa.
40 _ QUARRY SA | SEPTEMBER 2017