qpr-1-2013-foreword.pdf | Seite 191

Sectarian Interface Violence: ‘Hate Crime’ or ‘Anti-Social Behaviour’? Brian (west Belfast community worker), when talking about his work in engaging with young people from both sides of a particular interface in west Belfast, claimed: “we thought at the start that one side is trying to free Ireland and the other is trying to defend Ulster; but none of them had a clue about that: it’s the thrill they’re looking for!” This account also suggests that interface violence is devoid of any political or religious context. Brian claims that interface violence in the area he works within is “more about anti-social behaviour…it’s more recreational rioting that’s going on.” Nevertheless he also acknowledges that “in north Belfast it would be different because there’s always been an enshrined sectarian hatred.” This reflects the socially constructed nature of the term ‘hate crime’ relative to a given social context. That is, in the post-conflict era in Northern Ireland, the advent of the relatively new concept of hate crime is a way of labelling and challenging old problems of sectarianism within a particular framework. However, the anti-social conceptions of interface violence downplay sectarian hatred between divided communities, hence the construction of interface violence as merely recreational. Crawford (community worker) also provides a view of sectarian interface violence as thrill-seeking, which he suggests is analogous to anti-social behaviour such as football hooliganism. Converse to Barney’s views, Crawford claims – from his experience engaging with young people involved in rioting at the Short Strand interface – that the young people in question knew each other, had each other’s mobile phone numbers, and would both mutually participate in the organising of a riot. Ted (west Belfast youth worker) also claims experiences of a similar nature, whereby youngsters who apparently were friends with each other from across different interface areas, texted each other to ‘organise’ a riot. Ted thus claims that in some cases interface violence is recreational and is not always underpinned by intense enmity towards the ‘Other’. In this way, Crawford questions whether hatred is the key motive underpinning interface violence: “So my thinking is – is this based around sectarianism, or 191