qpr-1-2013-foreword.pdf | Page 101

An Analysis of the Relationship between National Courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union – Shifting from Cooperation to Superiority the preliminary ruling procedure. Conclusion It is suggested that the relationship between the CJEU and the national courts has changed throughout the years. Although the preliminary ruling procedure was initially established as an opportunity for communication between CJEU and the national courts, the problems of the system have discouraged English courts from taking part in this cooperation. The UK’s House of Lords considered the unacceptable delays, costs and incomprehensive rulings as crucial factors in making their decision whether to refer or not. However, it is not only the national courts which are in the process of abstaining from the notion of cooperation. The CJEU’s positioning as a superior court has also affected the initial idea of partnership. It sought to limit national courts’ discretion in determining the question of making a reference by introducing the Acte Clair doctrine. Unexpectedly, the doctrine has been relied on in a wide spectrum of cases, implying national courts’ eagerness to undertake an independent role in the development of the European Union’s legal order and the non-acceptance of the CJEU’s self-positioning as a superior court. As a result, the CJEU may perceive it necessary to intervene, as in Köbler where State liability for judicial errors was established. However, the CJEU set a high threshold for incurring liability, reminding national courts that they should consult it by making a reference. In consequence, the CJEU once again succeeded in putting forward its will and emphasising its superiority. The author agrees with the prediction made by Wattel (2004: 178) that eventually courts might engage in referring only because they do not want their governments to be held liable. Unfortunately, this is a significant departure from the genuine aim of the preliminary ruling procedure and can potentially place courts in a political dispute. This article rec- 101