PwC's Managing upstream risk: Regulatory reform review - An asian perspective October 2013 | Page 9

• Article 105(14) CRR – RTS on prudent valuation: 1 June 2014 2.2 Capital Requirements Update On 30 September 2013 the EBA published its final draft RTS on close correspondence between the fair value of an institution’s covered bonds and the fair value of its assets. These RTS will be part of the Single Rulebook aimed at enhancing regulatory harmonisation in the EU. The proposed final draft RTS relate to prudential filters applied to own funds. In particular, they specify the criteria for defining the close correspondence between the fair value of the covered bonds and the fair value of the assets for the purpose of calculating capital requirements. The final standards have been sent to the EC for their adoption as EU Regulations that will be directly applicable throughout the EU. The EBA also published on 3 October an updated list of FAQs on the Prudent Valuation Quantitative Impact Study, and on 7 October 2013 the revised deadlines for the delivery of EBA technical standards. Having considered the grounds put forward by the EBA, the EC responded with an agreement to the revised deadlines for the submission of the following regulatory products: • Article 28(5) CRR – RTS on multiple distribution for own funds: 1 April 2014 • Article 36(2) CRR – RTS on specific deductions from own funds: 1 January 2014 • Article 73(7) CRR – RTS on broad market indices for own funds: 1 January 2014 • Article 84(4) CRR – RTS on calculation of minority interests for own funds: 1 January 2014 • Article 100 CRR – ITS on asset encumbrance reporting: 1 November 2013 The FCA on 14 October 2013 published a consultation on the proportionality guidance on remuneration under CRD IV. Under CRD IV, bonuses and other variable remuneration must be capped at 100 per cent of fixed salary or 200 per cent of fixed salary if they are approved by 66 per cent of shareholders owning half the shares represented, or otherwise approved by a majority of 75 per cent of the votes represented (the “hard limits”). However, in its consultation paper the FCA says that an IFPRU investment firms can disapply the hard limits where it can be justified on the basis of the firm’s size, Banking | Regulatory Reform Review 9