Publications from ODSW Social Insights: Letters by DSW (Vol 2) | Page 156

Special Editions At the policy level, the government is beginning to appreciate that most important policies operate across departmental boundaries and it is therefore important to have collective buy in and ownership of the policy across departments. The problems of an ageing society, diabetes or local municipal issues cannot be solved simply by one government department. Among the civil society, there is a greater appreciation that the government cannot solve every problem. Most community concerns and improvements require a collective community effort to achieve good outcomes. Putting the pressure of time aside, the problems may appear seemingly easy but the process of resolving it in a sustained manner may require engagement that we are not used to or do not yet have the skills to do, putting the pressure of time aside. The greater involvement of civil society and community, however, makes the accountability line harder to establish. This requires then the negotiation of resourcing and accountabilities. These are again areas that are unspoken and should be part of the engagement process. As we mature in our ability to engage and do things collectively, we must continue to improve the channels for feedback. This will generate insights on how systems and processes for service delivery can be improved. Constructive feedback to decision makers should be encouraged and internal debates of policies, systems and processes should continue. It is always good to keep a focus on what the real impact is on people’s lives. Sustaining Social Development The sustainability of the many helping hands approach predicates on various players understanding their roles and a regular review and negotiation of those roles. The Singaporean approach of engaging the many helping hands builds on the value of participation and social capital. VWOs value partnerships and co-creation as increasingly most have embraced the strength of collective and inter-agency collaborations for improvements and finding solutions. This requires parties, be it VWOS, social service agencies, volunteers or any agent who provides help, to be ready to engage in strategic conversations, to be committed to rethinking roles and boundaries and to place individuals, families and the community at the centre of each party’s purpose. The government acknowledges the role of the market but fully appreciates that it cannot exclusively rely on market mechanisms. Singapore needs both good social policy and the market to work in tandem and in collaboration - a challenge that calls for calibration. As economist Amartya Sen puts it: 155