Publications from ODSW Social Insights: Letters by DSW (Vol 1) | Page 132

Ethics 2

determine whether the allegations are serious enough to warrant the case
going through the professional review process. The association may also
consider whether the case could be handled more appropriately within
the agency or through some other process. Accordingly, even though the
worker may have breached the Code, the case may not go through the entire
professional review process, particularly when the allegations of misconduct
are not severe.

Social worker and obligations
As social workers, we have a range of obligations. We have moral obligations,
some of which may come from our respective cultures and religions. We
have ethical obligations, some of which could come from our affiliation with
the association. We have legal obligations, including those that govern our
agencies and profession, as well as criminal and civil laws that govern all
people.
If you breach obligations, the potential consequences of the breach will
depend on the nature and severity of the breach. If you spread damaging
gossip about co-workers, it may be in breach of professional ethical principles
and may be subject to professional review. However, the breach may not be
severe enough to warrant professional review. Still, you may have breached
your moral obligations of respect for the dignity and worth of all people, and
the most significant consequences may be the informal reactions of your work
colleagues. You may lose their trust. They may retaliate verbally or they may
alienate you. You may also feel the wrath of your own conscience, perhaps
feeling bad and losing sleep over hurting your colleagues.
As Social Workers, we also need to be aware of statutory obligations which
may cause ethical dilemmas. For example, Social Workers are legally obligated
under the Criminal Procedures Code Sec. 424 to report cases of child abuse
and family violence which may violate the professional ethic of confidentiality.

131